Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 11 hrs, 11 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 23 hrs ago - more...
|
2013-09-02
, 08:46
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#92
|
Originally Posted by coderus
Yes I suppose it would be useful then
@juiceme for storing large files and be able to mount it to windows
Allright I'll look into it.
BTW, About this request you had before:
Originally Posted by coderus
I suppose you do not need this any longer as multiple partitions can be also exported by the default USB mass storage module?
@juiceme can you compile g_ether_multi for this kernel?
 |
|
2013-09-02
, 11:15
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#93
|
@juiceme not for me but it can be useful in any time for other. kernel should be powerful as much as possible, imho 
|
|
2013-09-03
, 18:27
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#94
|
Originally Posted by coderus
To celebrate the Microsoft aquisition of Nokia Mobile Phones, I hereby present a fresh kernel-plus-nat-exfat version.
@jackburton @juiceme
what about exFAT patches to your kernels?
https://gist.github.com/sourenaraya/6402692
(ExFAT being Microsoft creation, that is)
Get it from here: http://www.swagman.org/juice/zImage_...xtfat-20121301
(md5sum=5e9c4e445763256613810f8c5a5e9f07)
The new kernel is fully compatible with modules from the previous kernel-plus-nat version (http://www.swagman.org/juice/kernel-...9-plus_nat.tar) so if you've already got that there's no need to download new modules. Just upload the kernel to your ubiboot config (or flash it in case you are not using ubiboot)
I am running that now on my device, and it works correctly.
However, I have not tested mounting ExFAT partitions so be my guest and please test that functionality
|
|
2013-09-03
, 18:50
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#95
|
MAY wanna consider the licensing deal.
Distributing this kernel, just might be an issue, legalky.
From http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT
Companies can integrate exFAT into a specific group of consumer devices, including cameras, camcorders, and digital photo frames for a flat fee. Mobile phones, PCs, and networks have a different volume pricing model.
Distributing this kernel, just might be an issue, legalky.
From http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT
Companies can integrate exFAT into a specific group of consumer devices, including cameras, camcorders, and digital photo frames for a flat fee. Mobile phones, PCs, and networks have a different volume pricing model.
| The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-09-03
, 19:04
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#96
|
Originally Posted by nieldk
D'OH!
MAY wanna consider the licensing deal.
Distributing this kernel, just might be an issue, legalky.
From http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT
Companies can integrate exFAT into a specific group of consumer devices, including cameras, camcorders, and digital photo frames for a flat fee. Mobile phones, PCs, and networks have a different volume pricing model.
Actually that never crossed my mind, as I pulled the patch from a public repo... no idea it might be under licensing.
Just now as I checked it, it is not included in the latest mainline kernel. Maybe for licensing reasons?
Now I'm not a legal expert so I cannot say if just building a kernel with ExFAT is considered as distributing it? And is it somehow more condemned than makeing the patch publically available...?
|
|
2013-09-03
, 19:13
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#97
|
No lawyer myself also. But doesnt wanna see any of devs here, or this forum, get into troubles.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-09-04
, 05:14
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#98
|
relax, we're not manufactures or os developers
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to coderus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-09-04
, 05:19
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#99
|
@juiceme does your kernel compilation contains ip redirect
requested by @nieldk?
requested by @nieldk?
| The Following User Says Thank You to coderus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-09-04
, 06:16
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#100
|
Originally Posted by coderus
Well, unfortunately the XT_REDIRECT module does not exist in 2.6.32.59 yet. Quick googling tells me that it is implemented on mainline kernels 3.7 --> onwards.
@juiceme does your kernel compilation contains ip redirect
requested by @nieldk?
I could try backporting it to plus kernel but it's possible there are dependencies that cannot be resolved without patching the whole netfilter subsystem
Telegram | Openrepos | GitHub | Revolut donations