The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to alfmar For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-09-12
, 15:15
|
Posts: 649 |
Thanked: 762 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
@ Ohio
|
#1022
|
I'm inclined to think likewise @alfmar does really...
I already have pretty much what I need on SFOS and cannot really imagine what plusses would paid apps bring to the platform.
The few bits and pieces missing I can fill up myself pretty neatly.
|
2017-09-12
, 17:11
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#1023
|
I already have pretty much what I need on SFOS and cannot really imagine what plusses would paid apps bring to the platform.
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-09-12
, 17:25
|
|
Posts: 654 |
Thanked: 2,368 times |
Joined on Jul 2014
@ UK
|
#1024
|
Really? How about...
- A proper satnav solution. There are a few but none of them really good. Tile based, need cloud connection for both the maps and the routing
|
2017-09-12
, 17:42
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#1025
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-09-12
, 18:49
|
Posts: 959 |
Thanked: 3,427 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
|
#1026
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to taixzo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-09-12
, 19:19
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 50 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
|
#1027
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sthocs For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-09-12
, 19:51
|
Posts: 301 |
Thanked: 531 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#1028
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to rob_kouw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-09-13
, 07:15
|
Posts: 1,414 |
Thanked: 7,547 times |
Joined on Aug 2016
@ Estonia
|
#1029
|
Really? How about...
- A proper satnav solution. There are a few but none of them really good. Tile based, need cloud connection for both the maps and the routing, missing voice directions...
And those are just a few I can think off the top of my head that I personally lack. OK, maybe "paid" is not the requirement (there are some reasonably good free alternatives on Android), but "professional" would be nice.
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to rinigus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-09-13
, 07:25
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#1030
|
You also mention that you are SW engineer. I would suggest to get out and make the difference.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
sailfish os, sony xperia x |
|
A bit of math:
- Xperia X with Android sports "20Mp" in 16:9 at 5984x3366 resolution (20.14 millions pixels)
- Xperia X with Sailfish sports "16Mp", that is:
16 million pixels area in a 16:9 grid = 16Mp / (16*9) = 333² = about 5328x3000 resolution.
That is, about 12% less pixels on the X axis (~650 pixels less than in the 20Mp mode) and on the Y axis (~360 pixels less). I hope this difference is intentional and actually required to do the serious stuff before saving the jpeg file (only Cbeta guys can confirm the resulting quality), as ignoring outmost stripes from the captured image may help improve white balance. But clearly it means that Sailfish does "less than" the Sony-supplied camera software.
Having "many megapixels" is useless if the camera software saves the image without doing proper noise reduction, contrast enhancement, ISO sensitivity boosting and so on - things that only the sensor manufacturer knows how to calibrate.
Note: the only reason to have "many megapixels" was reducing the picture size - say from 20 to 2 megapixels - to wipe out artifacts and noise, but it won't give you a "night mode" shot better than the original OEM-developed driver of the sensor. Shooting in full sun will always give good results - the real test field for a camera is in low light environments.