|
2010-04-05
, 18:32
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 113 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1042
|
|
2010-04-05
, 18:33
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 113 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1043
|
|
2010-04-05
, 18:48
|
Posts: 67 |
Thanked: 36 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1044
|
|
2010-04-05
, 18:48
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#1045
|
|
2010-04-05
, 18:59
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 842 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Finland
|
#1046
|
If I am not on charge then doing a "cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep MIPS" repeatedly, shows the CPU scaling constantly between 250/125 and 600/700/800/900 depending on the kernal image used.
Whilst on charge the value stays locked at 600/700/800/900 depending on the kernal image used.
My assumptions then are that the BogoMIPS are a roughly direct representation of MHz and that what this value represents is in fact the current state of the proc.
Please correct me where I am wrong.
|
2010-04-05
, 19:02
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1047
|
|
2010-04-05
, 19:03
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#1048
|
You mean the hardware around the TI chip... they didn't design the TI chip, they just implemented it.
If I am not on charge then doing a "cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep MIPS" repeatedly, shows the CPU scaling constantly between 250/125 and 600/700/800/900 depending on the kernal image used
|
2010-04-05
, 19:11
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1049
|
|
2010-04-05
, 19:11
|
|
Posts: 284 |
Thanked: 80 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ London, UK
|
#1050
|
It seems that most people after flashing one of the overclocked kernels onto the device gets "Version: Unknown" listed in "About the product". This is however not the case for me (I use the 900ghz image), and I wonder if this could be due to me using fiasco-flasher on the device instead of the Flasher-3.5.
Not important, but just a little bit interesting.
|
thnx