Poll: Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!
Poll Options
Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 45 | Thanked: 24 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ The Netherlands
#1041
can someone explain me how to flash my device with 900 mhz? i already have downloaded the kernel voor 900 mhz, but how to install it??

thnx
 
Posts: 362 | Thanked: 113 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#1042
for those who have psx4all, do u all have pr1.2 sdk??
 
Posts: 362 | Thanked: 113 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#1043
Originally Posted by martie1 View Post
can someone explain me how to flash my device with 900 mhz? i already have downloaded the kernel voor 900 mhz, but how to install it??

thnx
go around page 70 theres lots of links etc
 
Posts: 67 | Thanked: 36 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#1044
Originally Posted by javispedro View Post
The crew who designed the hardware, yes...
You mean the hardware around the TI chip... they didn't design the TI chip, they just implemented it.


Originally Posted by javispedro View Post
How many times do I have to tell you that this is not the case?
So this is where I'll probably show you my limitation in knowledge and where I am making some vast assumptions but:

If I am not on charge then doing a "cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep MIPS" repeatedly, shows the CPU scaling constantly between 250/125 and 600/700/800/900 depending on the kernal image used.

Whilst on charge the value stays locked at 600/700/800/900 depending on the kernal image used.

My assumptions then are that the BogoMIPS are a roughly direct representation of MHz and that what this value represents is in fact the current state of the proc.

Please correct me where I am wrong.
 
Posts: 30 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#1045
why will the life time of the processor be halved . as long as its stable @900mhz its not like its running at 100% all day long


if you to run a stock processor all day at 100% that would probably shorten its lifespan too .


i bet most people dont use 100% cpu for more than say 10% uptime a day
 
Posts: 388 | Thanked: 842 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Finland
#1046
Originally Posted by LondonBenji View Post
If I am not on charge then doing a "cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep MIPS" repeatedly, shows the CPU scaling constantly between 250/125 and 600/700/800/900 depending on the kernal image used.

Whilst on charge the value stays locked at 600/700/800/900 depending on the kernal image used.

My assumptions then are that the BogoMIPS are a roughly direct representation of MHz and that what this value represents is in fact the current state of the proc.

Please correct me where I am wrong.
That's not a reliable way to check what states the processor spends time in. Use either powertop or cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state

Originally Posted by hollow View Post
why will the life time of the processor be halved . as long as its stable @900mhz its not like its running at 100% all day long
It (probably) won't get halved. It will get reduced, but no-one can tell exactly how much.
 
Posts: 30 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#1047
Anyone have an idea why flasher is saying this to me when i want to flash the kernel:

Suitable USB Device not found, waiting

help

im using this command:

flasher-3.5.exe -k zImage-900mhz -f -R

Last edited by Dirkjl; 2010-04-05 at 19:08.
 
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#1048
Originally Posted by LondonBenji View Post
You mean the hardware around the TI chip... they didn't design the TI chip, they just implemented it.
I was talking about the N900. And the people who wrote the datasheet did design and implement it.

Originally Posted by LondonBenji View Post
If I am not on charge then doing a "cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep MIPS" repeatedly, shows the CPU scaling constantly between 250/125 and 600/700/800/900 depending on the kernal image used
MIPS is a lie. Also, when you tap the touchscreen or the keyboard the device bumps the cpu frequency to the maximum temporarily. This explains why what you're doing is hardly a test.

Use the above or even watch cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/scaling_cur_freq .
 
Posts: 40 | Thanked: 41 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#1049
I ran Conky on my stock N900, watched it idle at 250MHz, plugged in the cable, and after it jumped up to 600MHz until I dismissed the connection choice menu it settled on 500MHz. After I disconnected the cable it dropped right back down to 250MHz.

This seems like it could be troublesome with OC, since I usually tend to charge my phone overnight, probably for longer than it needs.
 
Faz's Avatar
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 80 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ London, UK
#1050
Originally Posted by filologen View Post
It seems that most people after flashing one of the overclocked kernels onto the device gets "Version: Unknown" listed in "About the product". This is however not the case for me (I use the 900ghz image), and I wonder if this could be due to me using fiasco-flasher on the device instead of the Flasher-3.5.

Not important, but just a little bit interesting.
I just used fiasco-flasher from device, again, this time flashing from 900 to 800 mhz. Version info still intact.
 
Reply

Tags
cooking on gas, cortex-a8, faster, first to fry it wins!, hardware, its smoking, n900, need for speed, need for weed, nos, omap, omap3, omap3430, overclock, overclocking, soc, system-on-a-chip, the dogs, this thread got good!, vtec just kicked in y0!, warranty will be void, whooplah, zoom zoom


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:32.