Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 71 | Thanked: 33 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Munich, Germany
#1081
Originally Posted by Guber99 View Post
If you spent 600 plus on a device that does not perform as advertised.......would you give it a rest? I have a simple question: will provisioning appear for this device?
Sad to hear, but I guess we all do get your point (now?). You repeatedly slipped it into this thread just as the view counter seemed to be in a stalemate...

Anyways, I'm always up for reasonable proposals:

If your device has a German keyboard layout I'd be happy to buy your device. Not that I'd need a second one, but chances are that this will cut you from complaining about the same thing over and over. I counted a rough 48 postings on this topic from you in this thread...

You might as well wait though until maemo or a ported symbian app will provide exactly what you want. The choice is yours.
Peace, Bro.

Last edited by tomster; 2010-02-04 at 15:27.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to tomster For This Useful Post:
Posts: 254 | Thanked: 95 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ New Delhi, India
#1082
Hi,

I'm hoping someone will be able to help me with my problem of not being able to set up MfE on my N900. Being a non-techie, I have gone through most of the posts on this thread related to the issue and have done some homework before posting my problem. The details are:

Device firmware: PR 1.1
Exchange Server: 2007, with a self signed certificate; non-provisional devices are allowed

Error: Either exchange server requires secure connection or account disabled

Trials:

1. I have tried to install the certificate by copying it onto the device using Firefox on the PC, in .pem format, .p7b format and even in .p7c format. I copied this file onto the device. On the device, when I use file manager and click on the certificate file, it asks me to choose a program to run it. I select certificate manager, however the install option does not come up. It just gives me the details of the certificate. I thought it could be because it might not have a CA field. However, the details look like:

Issued to: ABCD (Name changed)
Issued by: ABCD
Valid from: gives the date
Valid to: gives the date
Fingerprint(SHA1): gives some alphanumeric characters (40 in all, excluding spaces)

So it seems it does have the CA too as it gives something for 'Issued by' field (Am I correct?). Still I'm not able to install the certificate.


2.
As given on the link

http://wiki.maemo.org/Mail_For_Excha...d_certificates

I tried all that on my x terminal, but the message that I come up with is:
.......
0115e5345e4dd64855ed1e3d44060be25f26c2e6 nixu-jum (I have changed the details for obvious reasons)
Verification failed: unable to get local issuer certificate
.......

3.
I have tried to lookup in the /ssl-ca directory on the x terminal too. However, there are no certificates installed there too. Else, I could have followed someone's instructions to symlink it to /activesync directory.

What can I try now?? It seems to be a certificate issue to me. I tried to install the certificate on a PC in my office too, but in the end it gives a warning saying that the certificate has an unconfirmed thumbprint (screenshot attached). Is there any way I can make the MfE work for this server?

The MfE works fine if I configure email of another company within my employer group. That one is an unsecured server though.

Please help.

Rgds,
Navsin
Attached Images
 

Last edited by navsin; 2010-02-04 at 16:22.
 
Posts: 3,617 | Thanked: 2,412 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Cambridge, UK
#1083
Originally Posted by navsin View Post
I have tried to install the certificate by copying it onto the device using Firefox on the PC, in .pem format, .p7b format and even in .p7c format. I copied this file onto the device. On the device, when I use file manager and click on the certificate file, it asks me to choose a program to run it. I select certificate manager, however the install option does not come up. It just gives me the details of the certificate. I thought it could be because it might not have a CA field. However, the details look like:

Issued to: ABCD (Name changed)
Issued by: ABCD
Valid from: gives the date
Valid to: gives the date
Fingerprint(SHA1): gives some alphanumeric characters (40 in all, excluding spaces)

So it seems it does have the CA too as it gives something for 'Issued by' field (Am I correct?). Still I'm not able to install the certificate.
The "Issued by" field is not the same as the CA field. If you look at the certificate in Firefox, the "Certificate Basic Constraints" section needs to say "Is a Certificate Authority".
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rob1n For This Useful Post:
Posts: 254 | Thanked: 95 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ New Delhi, India
#1084
Originally Posted by Rob1n View Post
The "Issued by" field is not the same as the CA field. If you look at the certificate in Firefox, the "Certificate Basic Constraints" section needs to say "Is a Certificate Authority".
Thanks Rob1N; I checked the certificate. It says "Is not a Certificate Authority". Does this mean there is no workaround for me to get my MfE on the phone? Or can I try something else?
 
Posts: 3,617 | Thanked: 2,412 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Cambridge, UK
#1085
Originally Posted by navsin View Post
Thanks Rob1N; I checked the certificate. It says "Is not a Certificate Authority". Does this mean there is no workaround for me to get my MfE on the phone? Or can I try something else?
As far as I know, there's no way to use that certificate with MfE on the N900.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rob1n For This Useful Post:
Posts: 254 | Thanked: 95 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ New Delhi, India
#1086
Originally Posted by Rob1n View Post
As far as I know, there's no way to use that certificate with MfE on the N900.
Can I still configure the email on POP?? When I try to do it, it gives me an SMTP authentication error, even though I can access the POP account from my laptop at home.
 
Posts: 3,617 | Thanked: 2,412 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Cambridge, UK
#1087
Originally Posted by navsin View Post
Can I still configure the email on POP?? When I try to do it, it gives me an SMTP authentication error, even though I can access the POP account from my laptop at home.
I've no idea - if this is using the same certificate, then maybe not (I don't know how the POP/SMTP setup is done or what checks it makes on certificates).
 
Posts: 71 | Thanked: 33 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Munich, Germany
#1088
I bet there are numerous services out there offering free SSL certificates.
I got mine from StartSSL. Though it's only issued for 1 year it helped me to sort out my former certificate issues. Best thing: it's free (at least for 1 year).
 

The Following User Says Thank You to tomster For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 291 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#1089
Originally Posted by tomster View Post
Sad to hear, but I guess we all do get your point (now?). You repeatedly slipped it into this thread just as the view counter seemed to be in a stalemate...

Anyways, I'm always up for reasonable proposals:

If your device has a German keyboard layout I'd be happy to buy your device. Not that I'd need a second one, but chances are that this will cut you from complaining about the same thing over and over. I counted a rough 48 postings on this topic from you in this thread...

You might as well wait though until maemo or a ported symbian app will provide exactly what you want. The choice is yours.
Peace, Bro.
LOL. I went back to my unlocked iphone and have to say what an eye opener for corporate email. Everything works flawlessly and this is not a WinMo device but apple OS that is able to communicate with my exchange server, with no provisioning issues, great search function and great display.

My N900 does not have German keyboard. I will keep it until next firmware update. If no provisioning by then, it will be a dinosaur anyways with all the new stuff coming out........for me to wait further.
 
Posts: 287 | Thanked: 127 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Sweden
#1090
Be glad you don't have a pre-3GS iPhone and a company policy requiring device encryption, then (which worked by lying up until OS 3.1, when capability reporting was corrected and the older devices not supported any more). But as stated above, Nokia has heard your complaint and by dragging it up here once a week you do nothing but annoy people.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to floffe For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
activesync, certificate, email, exchange, fremantle, ignore tex14, maemo 5, mail for exchange, mfe, n900, provisioning, sync, thanks vitaly!


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:55.