|
2011-10-04
, 01:04
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#102
|
With a very high probability you meant GPG, not GPS. Also, rpm itself doesn't support transactions, but the Fedora package management does.
http://www.rpm.org/wiki/RpmLog
(You don't necessarily know what you talking about, do you?)
|
2011-10-04
, 01:39
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#103
|
Wi are so ****ed
Meltemi is not linux!
http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokias-melt...or-s40-at-all/
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-10-04
, 07:50
|
Posts: 457 |
Thanked: 600 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#104
|
|
2011-10-04
, 09:03
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#105
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Helmuth For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-10-04
, 13:29
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#106
|
rpm itself doesn't support transactions, but the Fedora package management does.
To set up an RPM transaction, you don't have to do much. All you need to do is pass more than one RPM package on the rpm command line.
|
2011-10-04
, 13:56
|
|
Posts: 1,111 |
Thanked: 1,985 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Åbo, Finland
|
#107
|
|
2011-10-04
, 14:45
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#108
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zimon For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-10-06
, 04:40
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#109
|
Yep, GPG, weird freudian.
Anyway, deb is inferior on those points.
The security reason should be strong enough.
google for MITM attack vulnerability
|
2011-10-06
, 05:18
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#110
|
Tags |
deb & mitm, deb obsoleted, deb rox, dumbphones, linux, linuxmelting, meltemi, rpm sux |
|
http://www.rpm.org/wiki/RpmLog
(You don't necessarily know what you talking about, do you?)