|
2011-01-01
, 17:33
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 151 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#102
|
|
2011-01-01
, 17:53
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 48 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#103
|
|
2011-01-01
, 18:23
|
|
Posts: 175 |
Thanked: 99 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#104
|
|
2011-01-01
, 18:30
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#105
|
Modifications to GPL code need to be GPL'd in turn. So I don't believe it's illegal. Just immoral
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-01-01
, 18:53
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 151 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#106
|
|
2011-01-01
, 18:56
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 48 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#107
|
|
2011-01-01
, 19:06
|
Posts: 12 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#108
|
|
2011-01-01
, 19:08
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#109
|
|
2011-01-01
, 19:10
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#110
|
just thing is that patches are not touching gpl code and therefore are not gpled yet - only when you apply them onto kernel or something then thing is gpled - alex uploaded code that's not gpled ( and gpled parts as well ) so he broke the law
All this does is to ensure that lxp loses any further incentive to debug/test/enhance these drivers. Well done!
A merry Christmas and a Happy 2011 to all....
Last edited by thegman; 2011-01-01 at 17:56.