![]() |
2007-09-29
, 11:53
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#102
|
I also understand that a hardware upgrade as significant as the 770 to N800 on was is expected to break things. It's akin to the upgrade from 32 bit processors to 64 bit.
![]() |
2007-09-29
, 12:06
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#103
|
![]() |
2007-09-29
, 12:20
|
|
Posts: 564 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Fayetteville, GA
|
#104
|
![]() |
2007-09-29
, 13:12
|
Posts: 631 |
Thanked: 1,123 times |
Joined on Sep 2005
@ Helsinki
|
#105
|
In this sense it was not significant upgrade at all. Yes CPU is a bit faster and there is more RAM but nothing significantly different. You cannot compare it with big changes in architecture like going from 32 to 64 bits. It is like going from PC with 64MB RAM and Pentium@266Mhz to PC with 128MB RAM and Pentium II @333Mhz. Such changes happen all the time and there is no technical excuse for not having OS2007 running fully on N770. In fact this is what hacker edition is and you can see that it works quite fine on N770. The reasons for ditching N770 were not technical. They simply had no resources for maintaining both devices.
![]() |
2007-09-29
, 14:00
|
Posts: 503 |
Thanked: 267 times |
Joined on Jul 2006
@ Helsinki
|
#106
|
There is some truth in that, but I wouldn't completely agree on "nothing significantly different". Nokia 770 runs OMAP 1710 processor whereas the N800 has the OMAP 2420. Google the TI pages for details on those two, if you haven't already. As the hacker edition shows, quite many parts of the new software can be made to work - to some extent - but there are valid differences in certain things like DSP handling, which certainly aren't by no means trivial.
![]() |
2007-09-29
, 16:39
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#107
|
I certainly don't want to burst any bubbles or step on anyone's feet but what gives anyone an inkling of an idea that Nokia is or will come out with "any" backwards compatible hardware (Wimax card/adapter)or software for that matter for the N800 ?? So soon do we forget how Nokia left the 770 all but for dead when the 800 was released, so why given this track record gives anyone the impression that they won't do it again ?
![]() |
2007-09-29
, 16:43
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#108
|
HEY NOKIA! PUT MORE RAM AND A FASTER PROCESSOR/VIDEO PROCESSOR IN THE NEXT ONES!!! christ these things are slow.
![]() |
2007-09-29
, 18:46
|
|
Posts: 1,540 |
Thanked: 1,045 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
|
#109
|
I'm always amazed to see that sort of remark.
What's your benchmark, George? A desktop computer with a 2.4 Ghz dual processor and a gig of ram? Come on. A little perspective goes a long way.
![]() |
2007-09-30
, 03:36
|
|
Posts: 186 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Canada
|
#110
|
Anyways, I think Nokia has learned it's lesson from the 770 fiasco, and are listening to the rumblings of the community voice. Much like the N95 upgrades with more memory, higher capacity battery, and US 3G, the N800 brought more to the Internet Tablet side than we first expected from Nokia. True, they each lost a hardware feature that was important to many users: the protective cover for the N800, and the lens cover for the new N95-3/N95 8GB (good thing I'm in that bubble).
I can't say enough times that this is uncharted territory for Nokia, and is bound to make mistakes along the way. But unlike other large corporations I know of, they seem to actually care and are willing to learn from those mistakes and at least attempt to rectify the flaws that it's customers see in many of it's products.
Being one of the many 770 users that was very disappointed in how Nokia handled the "transition" to the N800 and later the dropping of 770 support, I know how hard it is to believe Nokia won't make that mistake again. I guess that's where hope kicks in.
I also understand that a hardware upgrade as significant as the 770 to N800 on was is expected to break things. It's akin to the upgrade from 32 bit processors to 64 bit. Probably not as smooth, but just as annoying to developers.
If I'm wrong about any of this, and I hope I'm not, I may become more like iball and start kicking Nokia in the jimmy (and remember, I have steel toe boots on).
NET9 - The Future of Mobile Information Technology
solid.gold.code - Is Your Code Solid Gold?
Internet Tablet Art Gallery - Artwork Made Using Internet Tablets
3pm - So good, it's illegal