quad
|
2008-08-27
, 01:20
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Aug 2008
|
#101
|
|
2008-08-27
, 01:30
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#102
|
Sorry qole, I didnt read enough. But you also failed to include a camera as a convergence feature that N8XX is lacking. But just the lack of phone and camera capabilities is enough to remove the N8XX from anyones list of a convergence device.
allnameswereout, if you can, get an N95 8Gig. If you can use ATT I would get it because you get 1.3 download speeds for $14.99.
The N96 is just not that much better.
Ive only used up 6 gig and when I need to I move some things off.
|
2008-08-27
, 01:37
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#103
|
Agree, GA. I use a Camera or HD camcorder to take photos. If I'm caught without a camera, I might use the Nokia's built-in camera app to snap something in 640x480 but by no means do I consider it a photo-quality device. More often than not, dedicated hardware INTENDED to serve a purpose tend to serve that purpose well and a 'convergence device' tends to, at best, do only a reasonable job. That's my experience, anyway.
|
2008-08-27
, 02:22
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#104
|
As for the camera. I always want to carry a camera with me, and always do. Policeman beating an old lady and you want to photograph the event? N95/N96 is more than good enough. N8x0 isn't. Car crash, wanting to quickly take picture including license plate? N95/N96 is more than good enough. N8x0 isn't. Basically, the mobile phone of the N95/N96/N82 is good enough for most people. Heck, it even allows flawless integration with social networking sites. With geotagging. Would be hard to censor that. Professionals carry better, dedicated cameras. Sure. Worth the extra spice, time, and effort. Well, unless someone asks you to remove the picture, "or else..."
|
2008-08-27
, 02:33
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#105
|
|
2008-08-27
, 03:32
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#106
|
|
2008-08-27
, 04:10
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#107
|
Sorry qole, I didnt read enough. But you also failed to include a camera as a convergence feature that N8XX is lacking. But just the lack of phone and camera capabilities is enough to remove the N8XX from anyones list of a convergence device.
|
2008-08-27
, 14:07
|
Posts: 127 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#108
|
|
2008-08-27
, 14:10
|
Posts: 127 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#109
|
|
2008-08-27
, 14:39
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#110
|
Convergence, in any meaningful sense, can't really happen until you can use a single radio & protocol for all of your data and voice needs. "Smartphones" are, at best, hack jobs on the same level as my Debian chroot hack. They cleverly disguise the fact that they are putting two separate worlds (voice and data) side-by-side, and make it look like those two worlds are "converging". They aren't. The fact they are living on the same device doesn't make them "converged". They're not truly united, they're only uneasy roommates, always jostling each other around in your tiny box.