|
2011-02-15
, 18:45
|
Posts: 96 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ New Jersey, USA
|
#102
|
That is what I don't get. Why throw away already worked on home grown os's for an outside one that so far has failed and that you will not have exclusive rights to anyway? Nokia is a huge company would it really have been that hard to keep actively developing meego and just see what would happen? As opposed to basically giving it a public hanging in the middle to the town square?
The Following User Says Thank You to alcalde For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-15
, 18:47
|
Posts: 380 |
Thanked: 459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Slovenia
|
#103
|
@tzsm98
@mikecomputing
Hes meeting with Intel today to talk about future of Meego
Source:http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2380269,00.asp
Also he said "You're going to see a bunch of highly exciting MeeGo announcements today."
^ thats where he is going to save his ***
The Following User Says Thank You to olympus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-15
, 18:51
|
Posts: 96 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ New Jersey, USA
|
#104
|
my sentiments exactly. only reason i can think of is that ms got scared of meego and it's potential to pull the rug from under windowms feet. symbian had the functionality, meego had the functionality and the wow factor.. would have been hard for ms to keep up with all the open source devs.
The Following User Says Thank You to alcalde For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-15
, 19:00
|
Posts: 96 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ New Jersey, USA
|
#105
|
WTF! Are you saying that Android isn't the future for consumers? And Meego is much better than Android on decent hardware.
|
2011-02-15
, 19:02
|
Posts: 96 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ New Jersey, USA
|
#106
|
I dont know if it has been metioned before, but look at what happened to Microsoft’s previous strategic mobile partners:
http://www.asymco.com/2011/02/11/in-...bile-partners/
|
2011-02-15
, 19:09
|
Posts: 96 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ New Jersey, USA
|
#107
|
Verizon doesnt't believe in nokia-microsoft alliance. They're right but when i read it statement i think that US are very arrogant
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/15/v...artnership-an/
|
2011-02-15
, 19:12
|
Posts: 302 |
Thanked: 254 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#108
|
|
2011-02-15
, 19:12
|
|
Posts: 513 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Sweden
|
#109
|
1. The only other horse is Android and then the market will be one iPhone and everything else Android. WP7 is like KDE4.0 and Windows Mobile is like KDE 3.5. It's going to take a little bit to get everything that was in the older version into the new one but a rewrite had to be done (unlike the "Symbian is forever" approach Nokia had).
Windows sales dipped because manufacturers stopped making WM6.5 phones and not too many began making WP7 phones. With Nokia, that changes. Nokia sales also dipped in 2009 and 2010 because of the outdated appearance of its software. With WP7 that's also about to change. I just don't see the gloom and doom. Sure it's going to be tough battling Google and Apple, but not any tougher than it was before. The partnership of Nokia and Microsoft definitely makes it a three horse race.
|
2011-02-15
, 19:17
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#110
|
Quote from Engadget, to me this seems like true multi-tasking, but I don't have the facts.
Microsoft indicated it didn't previously allow for third-party multitasking due to battery life concerns, but those concerns have been mitigated -- somehow. We're not sure of the API-level details that's letting all this magic happen, but we'll look for those later. All we know right know is that it looks great and we can't wait to try it out for ourselves.
Tags |
a hoax, alcalde babble, bla bla bla, micronokiasoft, nokia sux nuts, nokia=epic fail, plan(a-z), plan(t) |
|
The path to overcome even Blackberry will be hard at the moment until more enterprise solutions are in place for Microsoft/Nokia.