Reply
Thread Tools
vitaly_repin's Avatar
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#1131
Originally Posted by nokiabuff View Post
It is amazing that Nokia MFE expert does not know about server provisioning. Even in the Nokia corp I am sure their IT dept would want to have server provisioning of the phones.
1. I know about server provisioning. What forced you to think opposite?
2. A lot of Nokians use N900 without any problems. And IT department was not forced to change their policy to satisfy N900.

Regarding provisioning in general - it looks like a difference in corporate cultures in Europe and USA. European corporations tend to allow non-provisionable devices. American tend to disallow.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to vitaly_repin For This Useful Post:
SubCore's Avatar
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#1132
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
I think you might have confused "hardly advised" with "heartily advised". They're effectively opposites, but they sound almost the same, so it's an easy mistake to make.
in addition to that, "hardly advised" would be the direct translation for a number of languages. it's a common mistake amongst germans, f.ex.

btw, i already took the liberty of changing that word in the MfE Wiki site
__________________
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SubCore For This Useful Post:
vitaly_repin's Avatar
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#1133
Originally Posted by eitvedt View Post
My only question is: When will provisioning be implemented? My N900 will have to stay in the box until then.
As usually, I have to say that I am not Maemo marketing guy and can not communicate the plans for the future.

But what I can say is that I am in a long "fight" with platform enablers providers for several months They dislike me already I will become guber99 of Maemo if I continue this way

Originally Posted by oliverm View Post
Hi chaps,

We tried to set it up again straight away but now cant get past the server information. It says

"Exchange server is not responding verify account settings are correct".
This message means that the connection to the server can not be established in a reasonable amount of time (90 secs).

It can be caused by several reasons:
1) The server is really not accessible from the network you use. E.g., the port is filtered by the firewall. You can try to check is this a reality using the command line (xterm) and telnet utility.
2) The connection can be established but the server does not respond to the specific query in 90 secs.

Most probably your case is the second if you are able to start initial sync. In this case you can try to disable syncing of calendar and contacts and check how initial sync proceeds. And enable it later from the configuration application.

Originally Posted by kaz911 View Post
Is it not really time to wrap up this thread - and create a new thread with a summary. With 1100+ posts - this thread is now a nightmare to read through and a lot of posts relates to PR1.0.

It would be nice with a PR1.1 thread - and when PR1.2 or whatever comes out - do a summary and create a new thread.

just my two cents....
I am trying to keep wiki updated: http://wiki.maemo.org/Mail_For_Excha...rtbeat_and_FAQ

Regarding the new thread - I agree with you. I suggest to switch to a new thread when new MfE release will be publicly available.

Last edited by CrashandDie; 2010-02-09 at 12:32. Reason: multipost
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to vitaly_repin For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 291 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#1134
Originally Posted by vitaly_repin View Post
As usually, I have to say that I am not Maemo marketing guy and can not communicate the plans for the future.

But what I can say is that I am in a long "fight" with platform enablers providers for several months They dislike me already I will become guber99 of Maemo if I continue this way
Hahahhahahaah..............good one Vitaly. I have to admit that you are a hard working guy and I like you. Unlike Nokia Apologizers such as TexRat, you are factual with your comments.

Regarding the corporate culture, you are right. Americans are obsessed with their security and being able to control things (control freaks). That is the culture, and that is why I prefer Nokia Way. However, I need to respond hourly on my phone, and without being to sync with my server...................this wonderful device is of no use. And I will guberize until provisioning enabled!
 
Posts: 71 | Thanked: 33 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Munich, Germany
#1135
Originally Posted by vitaly_repin View Post
I will become guber99 of Maemo if I continue this way
Haha, that made my day!

Back to topic.

I get somewhat confused when trying to depict whether a feature request is MfE-related or not. After having it given some thought I come to the conclusion that this most eventually origins from where in maemo I make the desired settings. When setting up a MfE-account on the E71 I can define settings which are definitely not related to MfE-functionality per se. But the options are integrated in the GUI-wizard.

As example I would bring up whether to sync or not when on a GSM/ UMTS roaming connection (or similar with folder-subsciptions). All entries/ settings are set on the MfE-wizard though they are not directly MfE-related function-wise. But sure are GUI-wise.

As end-user you probably couldn't care less if the feature you just enabled by check-box is "powered" by MfE or some other tiny daemon hidden somewhere in the vaults of the maemo OS. But having those settings all in one place is what I'd call (end)user-friendly ;-)

What would I want to say?

I can't help thinking that there should be included as much setting options as possible in the MfE-wizard (or MfE settings tab) - even if they're not directly linked to MfE's original purpose - plain sync.
But the GUI - at least for me - is part of the MfE project too.

I know this sounds somehow ignorant to the devs' work behind the scenes, but having a nicely working/ feature-rich GUI is what probably 90% of us N900 users judge your progress on - especially since we can't check out SVN on changes ;-)

Last edited by tomster; 2010-02-08 at 19:09.
 
Posts: 56 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Italy
#1136
Originally Posted by vitaly_repin View Post
https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7971 ?
Hi Vitaly !

Welcome back !

Sorry to bother you...but if you could look at this issue...you'll make me happy and I could start using N900. Now it is alone in the desk :-( .
I don't know if the problem is due to the VERY POOR Calendar or to a problem in MFE protocol with 2003 server.
I cannot use calendar and task sync... it crashed the MFE sysnc process...Probably for the presence of recurring events..someone has showed a workaround to this issue but I don't have the time to cancel every recurring event in Outlook Exchange...so please...fix this as soon as possible.

Another thing: do you know someone responsible for Calendar/Modest coding in Maemo team?
We need to have those apps upgraded in several ways to improve usability and basic missing features.
Where we have to ask ?

Thanks,
Cesare
 

The Following User Says Thank You to SkyEagle For This Useful Post:
Posts: 336 | Thanked: 610 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ France
#1137
Hi,

I would suggest that those who believe in this thread moderate it themselves. Don't feed the troll and don't allow them to gain more momentum than required (none at all).

I will not hesitate to close this thread if it becomes a troll cave.

Guber99, you've been warned.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CrashandDie For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 291 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#1138
Originally Posted by CrashandDie View Post
Hi,

I would suggest that those who believe in this thread moderate it themselves. Don't feed the troll and don't allow them to gain more momentum than required (none at all).

I will not hesitate to close this thread if it becomes a troll cave.

Guber99, you've been warned.
WTF is wrong with you? Warned of what? Posting my inability to connect?
 
Posts: 228 | Thanked: 145 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#1139
Now that Symbian is open sourced, is there anything to be gained from its MfE?
 
vitaly_repin's Avatar
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#1140
Originally Posted by jacktanner View Post
Now that Symbian is open sourced, is there anything to be gained from its MfE?
Is Symbian MfE open-sourced?

Originally Posted by SkyEagle View Post
I cannot use calendar and task sync... it crashed the MFE sysnc process...Probably for the presence of recurring events..someone has showed a workaround to this issue but I don't have the time to cancel every recurring event in Outlook Exchange...so please...fix this as soon as possible.
Crashed or freezed? In other words, is it the issue described here: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7971 or different issue?

Another thing: do you know someone responsible for Calendar/Modest coding in Maemo team?
We need to have those apps upgraded in several ways to improve usability and basic missing features.
Where we have to ask ?
There are 2 ways to influence the responsible Maemo components:

1) File the bugs against corresponding components in maemo bugzilla
2) Contribute to the open-sourced code.

Modest is fully open-sourced. And calendar backend is open-sourced as far as I remember.

Last edited by CrashandDie; 2010-02-09 at 12:34. Reason: double post
 
Reply

Tags
activesync, certificate, email, exchange, fremantle, ignore tex14, maemo 5, mail for exchange, mfe, n900, provisioning, sync, thanks vitaly!


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:50.