Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Temporal's Avatar
Posts: 323 | Thanked: 189 times | Joined on Oct 2010 @ Brazil
#111
Originally Posted by Reggie View Post
Just saw the first set of spam (...) this spammer registered on Sept 17 (...) they can get around the the registration (...)
Oh no... that's what I was afraid of when I posted this:
Originally Posted by Temporal View Post
(...)BUT the bots probably already got a bunch of avatars, so, since the start of this crazy stuff, I guess all new avatars should be closed and asked for new verification mail (to sort real from bot, if possible).
Anyway, thank you for the hard work on the boards.
__________________
Love and Goodness are not a property. Are not a franchising. They are present in each one of us, and must be cultivated with KNOWLEDGE.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Temporal For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#112
Arg-- another football spam post showed up...
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#113
Originally Posted by ivyking View Post
the bots' numbers are declining rapidly, they are under 2.5k now !

also, this is new:
Most users ever online was 6,783, Today at 08:32 PM.

how many IDs have these bots registered already ? I fear the big crowd of bots have not posted yet, but has already registered, maybe that's why the additional security question has no effect ? as they simply registered before that took effect.
Those were viewers, in most threads you got spikes with x viewers 1 member x-1 guests.

Originally Posted by mrsellout View Post
All the extra people viewing tmo have probably searched google for that particular event and as tmo is normally a high ranking site, it appears near the top, hence the extra viewers here. This then leads to extra demand on the server and that's why people have been experiencing delays and timeouts.
Which is a type of DDOS. Whether from reddit, whether from google (or google tricking cheaters pagerank blowing spammers)...
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#114
What is going to kill us is those spam threads:
1. few posts with lots of links, google algorithm is safe, those are ranked low
2. maemo.org has a lot of links to mass events, people keep searching
3. the 400+ viewers threads have one or 2 links (one spanish version, or so called) but on a board logged with many links to that
4. profit
5. maemo.org dead

Google fix your **** up!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post:
towhatend's Avatar
Posts: 230 | Thanked: 185 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ Sweden
#115
Nooooo, they are back. Maybe my tip can be something then? Also, maybe we should have a restriction for how many treads a member can start a day or a mouth? Or if itīs possible, have that restriction only in the games section? (or misspell that one to gaijms or something very cool...:>)
 
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#116
Yeah, fight with the fact games subforum is most indexed by google. Then close Development, then Applications, leave only mod forums, those are not tracked. Spam gone.
Sadly, next step is captcha even on quick replies.
As long as people stop searching google for answers ending here, it will be a bounty for rankers.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post:
mrsellout's Avatar
Posts: 889 | Thanked: 2,087 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Manchester
#117
Originally Posted by towhatend View Post
Nooooo, they are back. Maybe my tip can be something then? Also, maybe we should have a restriction for how many treads a member can start a day or a mouth? Or if itīs possible, have that restriction only in the games section? (or misspell that one to gaijms or something very cool...:>)
How about posters with less than 10 posts can only make 1 new post (not reply) per 30 minutes, and a reported post automatically suspends posting privileges until a moderator re-enables them?
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to mrsellout For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#118
Can't we just pass a law to ban spam and be done with it altogether?
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
afaq's Avatar
Posts: 1,038 | Thanked: 1,408 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ London
#119
I propose emergency laws be bought in. Total lock down. No one leaves no one enters. Those who made it this far are in for the long haul and those left behind ...well are the lucky ones?
__________________
Graphic and Calligraphy Designer
check out my site www.afaqali.com
 

The Following User Says Thank You to afaq For This Useful Post:
Posts: 673 | Thanked: 856 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#120
Originally Posted by afaq View Post
I propose emergency laws be bought in. Total lock down. No one leaves no one enters. Those who made it this far are in for the long haul and those left behind ...well are the lucky ones?
That is not a good idea. I think all new members should be on probation. During that period, all of their posts would be approved by a human moderator. Once the first spam message occurs, ban the account, and so on.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to momcilo For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
diespammerdie, exterminates, itneverends, kudzu, spam!, spamspamspam..., texrat darlek


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:49.