Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 6 hrs, 6 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 18 hrs ago - more...
HugoSon |
2010-08-04
, 09:39
|
|
Posts: 221 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Germany
|
#111
|
Originally Posted by titan
...I think nobody can stick on v37 when there is a v39 available; we are just curious nerds
|
|
2010-08-04
, 10:20
|
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#112
|
@titan
but we can update to v39 even if we dont wish to dual boot right?
but we can update to v39 even if we dont wish to dual boot right?
__________________
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!
"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"
N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!
"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"
N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
| The Following User Says Thank You to gabby131 For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2010-08-04
, 10:39
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#113
|
I'm not from around here but could you switch to human versioning, e.g. 37u, 38d, 39d, with d being developer only builds so we can conveniently ignore d builds?
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
 |
|
2010-08-04
, 11:20
|
|
Posts: 334 |
Thanked: 171 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#114
|
Thats why he have 3 repositories. Use the extras repo if you are not a developer or just curious!
|
|
2010-08-04
, 12:30
|
|
Posts: 946 |
Thanked: 1,650 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#115
|
@ndi: v39 is only in extras-devel (unstable software). just disable the catalouge and you'll only see v37 from extras (stable).
@gabby131: yes
@maartenmk: now it's the fcam developers' job to build updated modules for the kernel.
Their drivers are independent and everything for building them is now provided by the repository.
I don't want to release a new kernel everytime they update their code.
@gabby131: yes
@maartenmk: now it's the fcam developers' job to build updated modules for the kernel.
Their drivers are independent and everything for building them is now provided by the repository.
I don't want to release a new kernel everytime they update their code.
|
|
2010-08-04
, 14:22
|
|
Posts: 182 |
Thanked: 69 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Netherlands
|
#116
|
Originally Posted by titan
Agreed. And I believe they said they would, so it should be a temporary problem. It just seemed to be not too much work to compile the -2 drivers, as a temporary solution. (but I don't know how much work it actually is, I'd try myself if I knew how).
[...]
@maartenmk: now it's the fcam developers' job to build updated modules for the kernel.
Their drivers are independent and everything for building them is now provided by the repository.
I don't want to release a new kernel everytime they update their code.
|
|
2010-08-04
, 14:32
|
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#117
|
Originally Posted by jakiman
Probably, but I would hate to be inbetween those times when Apple and the Jailbreakers are fighting the update game. Granted I think most jailbreakers wait until the jailbreak time handles the new Apple updates. But it only takes one potential "phone call" home to Apple to deem your device jailbreaked. And once is all it takes to invalidate your warranty (even if it's not a software issue).
Someone will find a way to bypass that also. (or be implemented within the jailbreak)
But again this is all speculation, Apple hasn't shown their hand yet (besides refusing service if you tell them your device is jailbroken).
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss
They're maemo and MeeGo...
"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
|
|
2010-08-04
, 14:34
|
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#118
|
I haven't installed any of the fcam related software into my N900. Are the current versions compatible with the v37 kernel that I could just download fcam from app manager and not experience any problems?
|
|
2010-08-04
, 14:51
|
|
Posts: 182 |
Thanked: 69 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Netherlands
|
#119
|
Originally Posted by maemoiv
No, see post #108 of this thread.
I haven't installed any of the fcam related software into my N900. Are the current versions compatible with the v37 kernel that I could just download fcam from app manager and not experience any problems?
| The Following User Says Thank You to maartenmk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-08-09
, 23:03
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#120
|
Originally Posted by titan
We're having a little trouble doing this. It seems like built versions of the kernel scripts that are present in kernel-headers (genksyms, modpost, etc) aren't present in kernel-power-headers. Am I missing something? I added a bug to the kernel-power-headers bug tracker in case this was just an oversight.
@ndi: v39 is only in extras-devel (unstable software). just disable the catalouge and you'll only see v37 from extras (stable).
@gabby131: yes
@maartenmk: now it's the fcam developers' job to build updated modules for the kernel.
Their drivers are independent and everything for building them is now provided by the repository.
I don't want to release a new kernel everytime they update their code.
This is what I do in scratchbox to compile fcam-drivers against the stock kernel:
Code:
apt-get source fcam-drivers apt-get install kernel-headers cd fcam-drivers_1.0.5-2 make KERNELDIR=/usr/src/kernel-headers
This is what I did in scratchbox to try and compile our fcam-drivers against the enhanced kernel headers
Code:
apt-get source fcam-drivers apt-get install kernel-power-headers cd fcam-drivers_1.0.5-2 make KERNELDIR=/usr/src/kernel-power-headers
If I try to build the scripts like so:
Code:
make -C /usr/src/kernel-power-headers scripts
Edit: This is with v39. I have extras-devel and extras-testing enabled in scratchbox.
- Andrew (one of the fcam devs)
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to abadams For This Useful Post: | ||
