![]() |
2010-12-27
, 20:13
|
|
Posts: 293 |
Thanked: 373 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Westside
|
#112
|
Nokia has money. The money "lost" is nothing compared to their money they've earned. I think the stockholders are just unhappy with the direction, not their pockets (not fully).
![]() |
2010-12-27
, 20:22
|
|
Posts: 293 |
Thanked: 373 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Westside
|
#113
|
I understand that you are somewhat disappointed about the lack of communication/information directly from Nokia. But this has always been the case with them. They have always chosen to speak less. That's their style. We can't help!
![]() |
2010-12-27
, 21:04
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#114
|
Nokia is putting an extra effort of not announcing/communicating releases too early. From a Finnish company, run by Finns (well, ok apart from the absolute top brass), a culture where day-to-day communication between individuals can be condensed into one sentence?
![]() |
2010-12-27
, 23:48
|
Banned |
Posts: 974 |
Thanked: 622 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#115
|
Now, I still would like to maintain that MeeGo+Qt+Symbian would offer a very compelling product to both the developers and the end-users. This combination has the potential to be very big and I don't want Nokia to tamper around with this well thought-out plan of theirs.
![]() |
2010-12-28
, 00:00
|
|
Posts: 402 |
Thanked: 451 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ India
|
#116
|
Besides, can anyone tell me what MeeGo is supposed to do, that Symbian cannot?
|
2010-12-28
, 00:04
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#117
|
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-28
, 00:19
|
Banned |
Posts: 974 |
Thanked: 622 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#118
|
![]() |
2010-12-28
, 12:43
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#119
|
![]() |
2010-12-28
, 12:57
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#120
|
Yea, that one. But how true is this? Look at Android, it is branching more and more off from Linux.
Google wouldn't do that unless they had good reasons to.
Besides, the upstream regarding ARM is 100% Nokia. I mean, it makes some sense, but not perfect sense, in fact it is far from perfect sense.
WM on the other hand, would be true upstream, that would make sense (if that is a possibility). MeeGo on Intel chips would make perfect sense.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
armageddon, circle jerk, going down, horoscope, internet eldars, mental jerk off, nokia of borg, phone different, rumors, unfounded |
|
With regards to (Eldar) reviewing unfinished products, well, I prefer not talking about it now.
The way I understand MeeGo is that it is majorly a Nokia/intel initiative but with them encouraging direct community involvement. I could be wrong but I am guessing that it would be almost 80% of the people (including employees & contractors) that would be paid by either Nokia or Intel. This as you would agree is way better than leaving everything to the community.
Now, I still would like to maintain that MeeGo+Qt+Symbian would offer a very compelling product to both the developers and the end-users. This combination has the potential to be very big and I don't want Nokia to tamper around with this well thought-out plan of theirs.
maemo.org - Custom Google Search