Poll: Delet the values from the speedpatch?
Poll Options
Delet the values from the speedpatch?

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,680 | Thanked: 3,685 times | Joined on Jan 2011
#1211
Originally Posted by stooobs View Post
im curious the way powersave bios works wouldnt it be the same as just underclocking 20 percent off the max cpu speed u have set
example if overclocked to 1000mhz then powersave_bios at 20 will tell the cpu to use 800mhz
im wondering if it will use a little more battry with the phone haveing to calculate this rather than just setting it to a base lowerstock speed
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=1186
__________________________________________________ __
__________________
N900: One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
 
Posts: 1,680 | Thanked: 3,685 times | Joined on Jan 2011
#1212
Originally Posted by epitaph View Post
_vi: consider this:
4*4 = 16
4+4 = 8
4^2 = 16

3*3 = 9
3+3 = 6
3^2 = 9

2*2 = 4
2+2 = 4
2^2 = 4

5*5 = 25
5+5 = 10
5^2 = 25

You can do basic arithmetic?
__________________
N900: One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post:
Posts: 147 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#1213
I have several problems, first I did not see any final changes after installing the latest version of the final patch and when installed and found some problems, such as some files do not exist or can not be identified and also can't install some packages try " -f install " and comes in yellow lines say that the patch is already installed .

How can I ensure the patch in a way to working 100/100 ?

I have several problems First I max speed to 1100 and raised the heat
When i open the contacts take the first time in 5 seconds
When i open the phone up to 3 seconds and then disappears then appears
And a lot of slow and Freezeing
 
Posts: 915 | Thanked: 57 times | Joined on Jun 2011
#1214
so whats the final thing of how to increase more battery? what shud be the max freq and min freq? upthreshold and sampling rate and what shud be the power bias.any expert plz reply.and jst get it end.i just dnt want my battery to increase so high.jst a decent one.like ryt now my healthcheck is showing 94 and batlevel is showing 81.i wish my healthcheck was tru but no.thts all i mean by increase battery life.healthcheck started to show more battery after i typed this----echo "blacklist bq27x00_battery" >> /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
 
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#1215
so far nothing is final thing
because testing these kind of stuff takes long time

but so far i have figured out that changing upthreshold and sampling rate
will decrease the performance

i have minfreq 250 and max freq 750
and i have a long stand by time
but a short time of continues usage (just like every one else)
so i tried to figure out the problem by making powersave_bias to 0 again
if the same thing happened i will try to modify the vfs cache

PS: can some one help me testing
because i have my N900 almost on standby
 
Posts: 19 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Aug 2009
#1216
Hello karam,

First, I'd just like to thank you for all the amazing, hard work you've been putting into this thing.

Unfortunately, I've also been having a serious battery drain problem since I installed this patch, even when the device is in standby.

I have attached two screenshots. The first shows my old standby power usage, and the second the new one after the patch. Prior to installing the patch, I had power kernel 47 running ULV at 950Mhz, with swappolube and CSSU. No smartreflex or other tools. I made no changes after installing the patch, but while the device does feel snappier, battery life is dysmal.

Thoughts?
Attached Images
  
 
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#1217
@JoeM

the battery drain problem is confirmed to be caused from one of the following :

1-) vfs cache
2-) powersave_bias

i have tested the patch before these tweaks and after
it seemed to me it has nothing to do with the battery life

however i'm not 100% sure of that
because as i said before i have my N900 almost always in standby
 
Posts: 235 | Thanked: 163 times | Joined on Dec 2008 @ Costa Rica
#1218
In my case, standby or normal phone usage (calls, sms) does not drain my battery dramatically.

But when using something more power consuming, like WiFi, it is obvious that it drains faster.

At this point though, I'm not sure if I care that much of power consumption vs the benefits obtained with the patch.

It could reduce my battery life, but I think I prefer to charge my phone more often and obtain the speed provided by the patch.

Also, I've set my CPU up to 805Mhz, soy maybe part of my battery drain is because of that.

@karam: I can test new settings/options, just let me know how apply them.
 
Posts: 915 | Thanked: 57 times | Joined on Jun 2011
#1219
@ karam u dint tell me y healthcheck shows more battery life than bat level.cufrenlt batlevel shows 48 and healthcheck shows 74 how to solve this issue?
 
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#1220
@lsolano

1-)if you have followed the 1st post instructions
then :
change back powersave_bias to 0
and test it

2-)after finish testing number 1
restore powersave_bias to 20
and increase the vfs cache to 100 (with swappolube)
then test it

3-)change back to default profile and apply powersave_bias=20 and vdd1+ vdd2 = 1


ARE U USING DEFAULT PROFILE OR IDEAL MODIFIED ONE?
and thanks for testing
it will take days to see what option is the best

@trisha02
i'm sorry trisha02 i don't use healthcheck
 
Reply

Tags
autobrick, awesome-script, do no install, f***epitaph, install it now, perfect_ n900, script-a-brick, very safe


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:52.