The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-08-27
, 17:54
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#122
|
I just dont think Nokia can continue with the Nokia N8XX the way it is now cause the sales guys in the Nokia store in Chicago whisper to me that the N8XX just doent sell much. If this is true than dont expect to see the N8XX around long in its current incarnation of not making phone calls
The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-08-27
, 18:01
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#123
|
The Following User Says Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-08-27
, 18:03
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#124
|
Yeah, I'm pretty bitter and pessimistic, I know. Without an obvious fountain of profit, I can't see any of the current carriers offering true high-speed data networks any time soon... They're only offering these things they call "unlimited data" because they know they can squeeze you in other ways.... Can you do good VoIP over this data-only plan? Is that $40 all you have to pay (no 3 year contracts, etc)? How much do the devices to access this network cost?
I hope you're right Benson. I really do.
|
2008-08-27
, 18:08
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#125
|
|
2008-08-27
, 18:39
|
Posts: 127 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#126
|
|
2008-08-27
, 18:45
|
Posts: 127 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#127
|
|
2008-08-27
, 18:46
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#128
|
fatalsaint, the point I making is that you
(meaning lovers of N8XX but against phone capability)
people
(whatchu mean, you people ?)
are not maintaining enough revenue/profit for Nokia to justify continuing to satify your fetish of limiting the N8XX to niche functionality.
Rather than be impossible being practicle is better.
This whole conversation is useless because I doubt Nokia is listening in to this sub-forum. We are like tree falling in the forest when no one is around.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-08-27
, 18:47
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#129
|
Nokia will not keep throwing money down the drain because they see a "stuborn", "impossible" bunch of gadflys (a complement) and say, "wow, look at those gadflys over there". "Lets throw money away on their fetish cause they are stuborn and admirably impossible". "Lets throw away a few hundred million".
The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-08-27
, 18:52
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#130
|
I really like my N800, and it is the best piece of technology that I've ever owned, but I freely admit that it is still very limited. But as I've been trying to say, the problem is that the infrastructure is pathetically limited, so I still haven't seen anything that I want more than my N800 yet.
Although I should warn you that tight pants may cause reproductive difficulties later in life.
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!