mthmob
|
2010-03-29
, 18:35
|
|
Posts: 378 |
Thanked: 206 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Denmark
|
#121
|
|
2010-03-29
, 20:34
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#122
|
|
2010-03-29
, 20:51
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#123
|
|
2010-03-31
, 05:34
|
|
Posts: 1,107 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Germany
|
#124
|
|
2010-03-31
, 11:44
|
|
Posts: 1,716 |
Thanked: 3,007 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#125
|
I guess not. What would you'd use to scale the result back to fullscreen? Unlike the Pandora, the N900 doesn't contain any hardware scaler.
|
2010-03-31
, 12:14
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#126
|
|
2010-03-31
, 12:33
|
Posts: 478 |
Thanked: 101 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#127
|
|
2010-03-31
, 13:49
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#128
|
The Following User Says Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-03-31
, 14:27
|
|
Posts: 1,716 |
Thanked: 3,007 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#129
|
|
2010-03-31
, 14:31
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#130
|
??? SGX is slow? Could you elaborate?
Or did you mean SGX scaling is slower than simple pixel doubling?
And what if you want to do more and do antialiased scaling?