The Following User Says Thank You to lfcobra For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-03-15
, 20:04
|
|
Posts: 168 |
Thanked: 108 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Luleå, Sweden
|
#122
|
My further take on this: http://tabulacrypticum.wordpress.com...esponsibility/
The Following User Says Thank You to oxpo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-03-15
, 20:07
|
|
Posts: 139 |
Thanked: 135 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Cambridgeshire, UK
|
#123
|
My further take on this: http://tabulacrypticum.wordpress.com...esponsibility/
|
2010-03-15
, 20:11
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#124
|
My real concern is that everyone keeps saying "meego app will work on maemo5 with little or no modification." The problem with that is that its up to the developer to want to release their app on both maemo and meego. Sure it may be as simple as recompiling the code with no changes at all but if the developer doesnt do it and the source code isnt open, then one OS is left without the app. Independent developers will almost certainly release their apps for both meego and maemo but what about apps from companies? I can currently get things like a Geico app on an iphone but there is no such app for symbian platforms. I know that iphoneOS and symbian are nothing alike but i think the argument is valid: if the developer doesnt want to release multiple versions of the application (even if no changes are needed) then theres no guarantee that maemo will get the app.
Also if the new meego applications require new hardware to function (e.g. multitouch capable screen) the n900 wouldn't be able to run these apps either. It just upset me when I keep reading that "maemo can run meego apps! stop worrying!" It can only run the apps if the developers want it to.
The Following User Says Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-03-15
, 20:15
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#125
|
I really do respect your optimism over this but you need to understand that I and many others don't share it. Do not get me wrong... I certainly hope that you are right on this one but my personal experience with Nokia devices leads me to expect you are not.
It's a shame that the biggest spreader of "FUD", Nokia, do not see the need to protect their image and customers by being more communicative and affirmative regarding device support timelines etc.
On another point people on this forum need to be aware that the N900 is being sold, in the UK at least, as an uber-powerful new multimedia smartphone. One of the UK's biggest mobile retailers Carphone Warehouse is selling it this way. I went in to a store today and pretended to be a lay user interested in upgrading to the N900 having seen their adverts - they certainly aren't selling it as a dev-device. Don't be so hard on people on this point - just because you may realise it, doesn't mean that your average Joe consumer hasn't been sold it without being warned/made aware of this.
|
2010-03-15
, 20:17
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#126
|
I really do respect your optimism over this but you need to understand that I and many others don't share it. Do not get me wrong... I certainly hope that you are right on this one but my personal experience with Nokia devices leads me to expect you are not.
|
2010-03-15
, 20:21
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ berkshire, england
|
#127
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jimmyb5374 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-03-15
, 20:28
|
Posts: 478 |
Thanked: 101 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#128
|
|
2010-03-15
, 20:34
|
Posts: 607 |
Thanked: 450 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#129
|
Well considering Nokia and Intel's goal is to run Meego on nearly everything, if a developer wants to create a multi-touch only app, then their app is only marketable to devices with multi-touch capability. Meego isn't N900 + next Nokia device. Meego is netbooks, mobile devices, TVs, etc..thus a developer that wants the largest audience will make an app that isn't limited to certain hardware forms.
|
2010-03-15
, 20:47
|
Posts: 12 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Little Rock
|
#130
|
My further take on this: http://tabulacrypticum.wordpress.com...esponsibility/
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to astrolito For This Useful Post: | ||
My real concern is that everyone keeps saying "meego app will work on maemo5 with little or no modification." The problem with that is that its up to the developer to want to release their app on both maemo and meego. Sure it may be as simple as recompiling the code with no changes at all but if the developer doesnt do it and the source code isnt open, then one OS is left without the app. Independent developers will almost certainly release their apps for both meego and maemo but what about apps from companies? I can currently get things like a Geico app on an iphone but there is no such app for symbian platforms. I know that iphoneOS and symbian are nothing alike but i think the argument is valid: if the developer doesnt want to release multiple versions of the application (even if no changes are needed) then theres no guarantee that maemo will get the app.
Also if the new meego applications require new hardware to function (e.g. multitouch capable screen) the n900 wouldn't be able to run these apps either. It just upset me when I keep reading that "maemo can run meego apps! stop worrying!" It can only run the apps if the developers want it to.
Am I totally wrong? Have I misunderstood the development process of applications for the QT platform? Please feel free to let me know if i am wrong because I really want to understand the situation.