|
2010-08-16
, 05:08
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#122
|
Here's a link to what I've referenced in my post:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VB6hLg3PRbY#t=4m01s
Here's another shocker:
If you want to ***** and moan to Nokia due to their sub-par support and execution of N900 (in the commercial sense), then I'm with you on that.
But, if you relegate Nokia's part of the bargain and put its full weight on the community, then that's where we part ways. "The community" (that is to say 'we'), are not directly responsible for N900's success or its long term sustainability as a product.
|
2010-08-16
, 05:17
|
Posts: 24 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Feb 2009
|
#123
|
The Following User Says Thank You to happymonkey For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-08-16
, 05:22
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#124
|
|
2010-08-16
, 05:26
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#125
|
|
2010-08-16
, 05:30
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#126
|
"what is this community prepared to do for us regarding the N900?" is a flawed statement, if taken literally. As has been intimated at, iterated again, and reiterated countless times but never actually asked of abill_uk, what were you thinking using the word "us" as though we are in some way distinct from the community, that is as apposed to using the word "we"?
If I assume the words used were in err of abill''s real intent then the object of interest is not so much a question but a public proposal to move towards a more formal community recognition that Nokia is likely unlikely to work with us, and urge that we invest more energy as a community towards the goal of autonomy.
"What we've got here is failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach, so you get what we had here last week which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it. And I don't like it any more than you men."
-- Captain, Road Prison 36 in Cool Hand Luke
|
2010-08-16
, 05:35
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#127
|
|
2010-08-16
, 05:40
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#128
|
|
2010-08-16
, 06:04
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#129
|
I feel you do not realise the important role a community plays in any situation.
A community is where people get together and work together NOT going at eachother and arguing why this why that.
The Following User Says Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-08-16
, 06:08
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#130
|
I dont actually mind at all about that as long as this community unites in some way and works together to achieve something constructive for the N900.
I am not important... the N900 IS !.
Tags |
blablabla bla, check offenders, community v us, lost dummy, reggie please, show-me-proof, shutupabillpls, wheres-reggie |
|
So do we debate here and make an issue of the decisions Nokia have made or do we go with them and if need be improvise but at least on the same track as they are on not one that has suddenly came to a dead end, or do you see Maemo as your thing or are you going to dispute Maemo is not coming to an end support wise from Nokia?.