Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
clasificado's Avatar
Posts: 466 | Thanked: 180 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#121
Originally Posted by TiagoTiago View Post
Many windows installers got a command line option for "unattended mode"..... *pouts*
please, dont go off-topic
 
Posts: 1,522 | Thanked: 392 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ São Paulo, Brazil
#122
Why the stuff that goes on with package managers wasn't just regular regular installers running in unattended mode?
 
jflatt's Avatar
Posts: 534 | Thanked: 723 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#123
This one-man whine fest is going to go in circles forever. It is like explaining to a small child, and they repeatedly ask why after each answer. Eventually you have to say 'because it just f'ing does'
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jflatt For This Useful Post:
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#124
Originally Posted by TiagoTiago View Post
Why the stuff that goes on with package managers wasn't just regular regular installers running in unattended mode?
Many. For a start, "unattended mode" is hardly standarised; you'll quickly find that implementing a package manager over random third party installers quickly requires human intervention -- as the many "win-apt"-like projects found (which tried to implement "windows" package managers).

Either way I do agree with clasificado. I didn't get your point here.
 
Posts: 1,522 | Thanked: 392 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ São Paulo, Brazil
#125
They can all standardize the packaging stuff, why not the installer system?



@jflatt: indeed we've been around in a few aspects, but i've been learning a lot with what some people say here (also a few things make lots of sense once they've been pointed out for me, not necessarily new information, but presented in a way that makes things fit together in my head)
 
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#126
Originally Posted by TiagoTiago View Post
They can all standardize the packaging stuff, why not the installer system?
It would require all third party vendors playing the same game, which is nearly impossible in the Windows world, and would take 5 years at best (think how many Windows software is still not using MSI, which is 8 years old).

And I still don't get your point.
 
Posts: 1,522 | Thanked: 392 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ São Paulo, Brazil
#127
I mean incorporate a standalone installer in the packaging system, for mass installation it would work just like a plain package, but when desired would have all the options one would expect on a decent installer

edit: and would work with different packaging systems etc, even possible to install without one as well

Last edited by TiagoTiago; 2010-10-12 at 21:41.
 
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#128
Originally Posted by TiagoTiago View Post
I mean incorporate a standalone installer in the packaging system, for mass installation it would work just like a plain package, but when desired would have all the options one would expect on a decent installer

edit: and would work ith different packaging systems etc, even possible to install without one as well
Main reason is the one I stated on an earlier post: few people if any would use it.

The current trend is the exact opposite; that is: to move to question-less packages. See Microsoft Installer, iPhone apps, etc.
 
Posts: 1,522 | Thanked: 392 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ São Paulo, Brazil
#129
So basicly, until someone makes an specialized solution for the N900, we're pretty much screwed?



I was hoping this thread wouldn't end with "Well, dung happens"
 
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#130
Originally Posted by TiagoTiago View Post
So basicly, until someone makes an specialized solution for the N900, we're pretty much screwed?
And that's something I wanted to hear, just to then be able to ask: what's the problem you just experienced that triggered this discussion? Can we concentrate on fixing _that_ package instead of the world?

Don't you realise that if such package was fixed, you WOULDN'T need the option you're asking for, at all?

Last edited by javispedro; 2010-10-12 at 21:56.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
nerd rage, whatthef?


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:20.