Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#1311
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
Most people use a headset of some form (bluetooth, wired, whatever)...
Really? I see headsets in use so rarely, I find this surprising. Is there published data on this?
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#1312
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
  • A WWAN Radio built in is bad because of X -- Moot: the NIT already has a WWAN family member, the N810 WiMAX Edition.
WiMAX really isn't comparable to 3G, especially not when you throw voice in the mix.

Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
Really? I see headsets in use so rarely, I find this surprising. Is there published data on this?
As with most of the proponents of a cellular radio in this thread, it seems to be just a lot of made up statistics and hot air.
 
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#1313
Originally Posted by tso View Post
the thing about wimax is that many see it as a extended range wifi, and therefor not tied to the evil that its the mobile operators.
No, it has nothing to do with WiFi. WiFi is an unlicensed spectrum for short range. WiMAX is a licensed spectrum for medium range.

Also, not all WiMAX access providers are (old) mobile operators earning money from people who pay by the minute to speak to one another. That is one of the reasons it is exciting.

sad thing is that most wimax implementations so far are using licensed frequencies.
Yeah, and knives are used to cut something.

so no chance for a urban area to pop up a couple of wimax antennas gotten of the shelf and hooked into some peer or transit provider, municipal style...
That is what unlicensed spectrums are for, but only short range can be unlicensed.

thing is that for me any kind of 3G radio in the tablet would bring the price up without adding much in the way of utility.
For you, indeed, but I'd say a device meant to be used on the Internet (and relying on this for functionality) should easily provide access to the Internet.

i already own a phone that i can use for those times that i cant access a wifi connection. and that happens so rarely, that paying for two subscriptions/plans would be overkill. instead i can use the one phone connection i already have with any device that has bluetooth or a usb port (if i remember to bring the cable).
Thats great for you, but normal people need to care about 2 devices, and normal people aren't able to always get a legal WiFi connection.

With another device there is another point of failure, you need to care about 2 batteries, you need to care about 2 stable devices, you need to carry 2 devices, you need to carry cables for 2 devices, you need to start up 2 devices. Oh wait... you want to use navigation? Go grab yet another device.

I want one small, stable device which is able to be used for navigation, audio, video, Internet, PIM. Integrated and synced. And yes, it might cost something more than 500 USD indeed.

so a 3G radio would basically be expensive dead weight.
For you, yes. You already own a phone, and are apparently happy with it.

oh, and using the tablet for voip, not this guy. i carry a phone, i use a phone, simple as that. i would much rather see xmpp get a single voice and video standard in place then sign up for skype, gizmo or some other voip provider.
Earlier you expressed unhappyness about mobile operators, now you argue against SIP. SIP is great if you have 24/7 connectivity.

on the other hand, i would not mind seeing a CF slot
IIRC CF doesn't allow enough I/O.

EDIT: Wrong, standard & specs have considerably evolved.

oh, and did people see this recent development on the neo freerunner:
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS6565189083.html

i wonder if nokia could provide for something similar on the next tablet
ISPs love DVB-H for it decreases their bandwidth. Phones with such capability are heavily subsidized by telcos here.

dont know about others, but my favorite toy growing up was lego
..and your current one is your mobile phone?
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!

Last edited by allnameswereout; 2008-09-13 at 15:39. Reason: EDIT (misattributed quote)
 
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#1314
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
As with most of the proponents of a cellular radio in this thread, it seems to be just a lot of made up statistics and hot air.
-1 lack of audi alteram partem
-1 flamebait
-1 guilty by association/generalisation
-1 leadership bonus

Total score: -4.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
Posts: 1,213 | Thanked: 356 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ California and Virginia
#1315
Look, all the N900 needs is the following:

-5 Ghz 16-Core ARM/x86 hybrid processor
-AGPS, with the cool free satellite internet that only hackers from Die Hard know about
-Hologram Projector
-Voice Recognition
-Solar/Kinetic/Wind power (no recharge, infinite battery)
-Taser to shock the iPhone users
-Enough graphics power to emulate a few PS3s
-super high res multitouch, folding screen, that can stretch to any size and resolution, and provides tactile feedback and raised surfaces (as well as holograms)
-Virtual surround sound
-Everything else I cant make up (use your imagination)

Oh, and under 200 bucks please!
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Thesandlord For This Useful Post:
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#1316
Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
I want one small, stable device which is able to be used for navigation, audio, video, Internet, PIM. Integrated and synced. And yes, it might cost something more than 500 USD indeed.
if so, why did you get a tablet?

..and your current one is your mobile phone?
no, data networks/connections. my current phone is a fairly unimpressive feature phone from sonyericsson...
 
El Amir's Avatar
Posts: 487 | Thanked: 152 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ London, UK
#1317
Originally Posted by Thesandlord View Post
Look, all the N900 needs is the following:

-5 Ghz 16-Core ARM/x86 hybrid processor
-AGPS, with the cool free satellite internet that only hackers from Die Hard know about
-Hologram Projector
-Voice Recognition
-Solar/Kinetic/Wind power (no recharge, infinite battery)
-Taser to shock the iPhone users
-Enough graphics power to emulate a few PS3s
-super high res multitouch, folding screen, that can stretch to any size and resolution, and provides tactile feedback and raised surfaces (as well as holograms)
-Virtual surround sound
-Everything else I cant make up (use your imagination)

Oh, and under 200 bucks please!
All of those features were Soooo 2007
__________________
Follow me on twitter HERE!

Applications I've made:
- Vuvuzela
- LTM: London Tube Map
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#1318
Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
but thats me. some others may want a one device solution. to them i would say to grab a HTC or iphone.
The iPhone is far from being an all-in-one solution. Unless you narrow your definition of "all" to being a few specific things.

HTC has a couple of devices that come close to "all in one", but they're REALLY _HUGE_. Like the "advantage" and "shift". Not even close to pocketable.
__________________
My Personal Blog
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#1319
the advantage is not that much bigger then the N810...

http://www.sizeasy.com/page/size_com...-Playing-Cards
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#1320
Originally Posted by tso View Post
the advantage is not that much bigger then the N810...

http://www.sizeasy.com/page/size_com...-Playing-Cards

Huh. I never looked at its actual dimensions. I had just seen pictures of people working with it and carrying it/etc. And it just looked like it was 2-3x bigger than an iPod. Like maybe closer to the size of the Samsung Q1 (non-ultra).

Learn something new every day.
__________________
My Personal Blog
 
Reply

Tags
dpads are fun, ideas, n900, n900 wishlist, revenge of the styli, stuff for nokia to read, the wrath of sty, wishlist


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:16.