Rotkaeqpchen
|
2009-11-17
, 13:47
|
Posts: 225 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
|
#1311
|
|
2009-11-17
, 13:49
|
|
Posts: 143 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Abuja, Nigeria
|
#1312
|
So basically, you and a lot of the people on this thread listened to the retailers dates and totally ignored Nokia. Nokia said Q3, then delay, then shipping on 10th. I just dont see the big deal. Why oh why you listen and believe the retailers (they WANT your order so will very readily make up dates to get your cash) I have no idea.
People need to use their brains a bit in this thread.
|
2009-11-17
, 13:54
|
Posts: 147 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Lincs, UK
|
#1313
|
|
2009-11-17
, 13:56
|
Posts: 161 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#1314
|
|
2009-11-17
, 13:57
|
|
Posts: 1,217 |
Thanked: 446 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Bedfordshire, UK
|
#1315
|
No information since the devices "shipped" and no real status updates by any channel partners since Tuesday when Nokia said they shipped. If there are any fellow logistics people here that deal with shipments, you will know the answer.
The N900's were probably shipped by boat.
|
2009-11-17
, 13:57
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#1316
|
|
2009-11-17
, 14:07
|
Posts: 519 |
Thanked: 366 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ North Carolina (Formerly Denmark and Iceland)
|
#1317
|
Folks, they are on a boat- that is why we are in the dark and Nokia does not want to admit this, since they do not want to pi55 even more people off.
They probably saved a couple dollars per unit shipping by boat. This is an estimate, since pallet weight is the actual bulk charge (not counting other fees etc).
|
2009-11-17
, 14:10
|
Posts: 315 |
Thanked: 64 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Montreal, canada
|
#1318
|
|
2009-11-17
, 14:17
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#1319
|
|
2009-11-17
, 14:19
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#1320
|