|
2009-06-28
, 08:55
|
|
Posts: 559 |
Thanked: 1,017 times |
Joined on May 2008
@ Finland
|
#1372
|
and? to my understanding, you're still mixing the town of nokia with nokia the corporation.
|
2009-06-28
, 09:03
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 145 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Sydney, Australia
|
#1373
|
|
2009-06-28
, 09:23
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#1374
|
3. I am still using my E70, as Nokia has not released a better phone so far. Unfortunately, it is very slow by today's standards. OMAP850 and 48MB RAM just don't cut it nowadays
|
2009-06-28
, 09:26
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#1375
|
|
2009-06-28
, 13:39
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#1376
|
OMAP 1710 actually, and 64MB physical RAM (48MB is the "accessible" figure after taking into account the OS overheads). Nearly identical to the 770 inside.
On the outside it had a quite decent screen resolution (nearly double the pixels of the other models in the range) and a keyboard that feels similar to the N810's but with a full 5 rows of keys.
|
2009-06-28
, 13:46
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#1377
|
regardless of "for its time" (I don't care about "for its time", I care about "can it do what I want/need"), I found the internet capabilities of that generation of nokia phones to be entirely sub-par. My E61i was cheaper than that. My G1 was cheaper than that. I don't see the value in paying that much for a "just voice+sms" device, when my "voice+sms+internet" device costs less.
3) whether or not Nokia has released a better phone, other companies have. And, more importantly, since then I realized that I wanted more than just a voice+sms device. I don't want to carry two pocketables.
|
2009-06-28
, 17:33
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#1378
|
Hate to disappoint you, but your E61i had exactly the same web browser as E70, except the keyboard of course. So, by your definition, E61i is not supposed to have "internet capabilities" either.
As to your devices "costing less" with the AT&T or TMobile contract, that is actually not true. I am too lazy to explain why, but ask around and other people will tell you.
|
2009-06-28
, 17:53
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#1379
|
You're not disappointing me, you're confirming me. My E61i is also an inadequate internet device. That's why I don't use it anymore.
Even if someone didn't hit a sweet spot, have a certain need for a level of service that was identical on or off contract, nor get an early adopter type discount on the phone... the full price of the G1 is only barely higher than the price range you gave for the E70. Why on earth would I pay as much as $300-$400 for a phone that is, in my opinion, only useful for voice+messaging?
There is absolutely no cost analysis of the E70 that would make it worth my while to buy one, nor worth my while to have picked one over the G1. NONE.
|
2009-06-28
, 18:13
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#1380
|
You are comparing device available in 2006 with device released in 2008, at their initial prices. This is not very fair.
Tags |
disapointed by nokia, dpad, maemo phone, my tablet is crying, n900, nokia gets it wrong, openmoko, rover, rx-51, rx-71 needed, screen size, smartphone, t-mobile |
|
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone