![]() |
2012-06-10
, 21:12
|
Posts: 239 |
Thanked: 70 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Germany
|
#1381
|
![]() |
2012-06-10
, 23:32
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Dec 2011
|
#1382
|
The more logic choice (from my personal point of view) is to just stick to one phone for whatsapp use, which could be the one without the sim card, since whatsapp doesn't need it for it to work after you've registered. At least, not in android (I've tested this behaviour with a Samsung Galaxy I9003 and using Bluestack to emulate android system on my computer)
Edit: just to be sure i make myself clear.. Whatsapp takes into account the device IMEI during login and not the sim card presence. And as it can use wifi to send and receive messages, sim card is actually not needed for anything but receiving the sms during register (and 3g, if you really need it)
![]() |
2012-06-10
, 23:39
|
Posts: 32 |
Thanked: 39 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ London
|
#1383
|
i don't have a big consumption, but i realized the fact that we're the only persons who are online all the time... is it maybe possible that this will be fixed that we are just shown as online when the app is open and not when it runs just in the background?
![]() |
2012-06-10
, 23:50
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jun 2012
|
#1384
|
just to share that this is not true for symbian belle. Whatsapp on my N8 require a sim card to initialise. Once initialised, you can use wifi to send and receive and remove the sim card.
i don't have a big consumption, but i realized the fact that we're the only persons who are online all the time... is it maybe possible that this will be fixed that we are just shown as online when the app is open and not when it runs just in the background?
why would you want it running in the background doing nothing but consuming power.
![]() |
2012-06-11
, 02:25
|
Posts: 32 |
Thanked: 39 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ London
|
#1385
|
![]() |
2012-06-11
, 03:00
|
Posts: 8 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ São Paulo, Brazil
|
#1386
|
![]() |
2012-06-11
, 03:12
|
Posts: 32 |
Thanked: 39 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ London
|
#1387
|
Yes, it's better to be shown online! I was just wondering if this could reduce the power consumption. I mean: If we're aways online, does it means that we're aways having communication? If not, fine! But if yes, it's not so efficient, right?
![]() |
2012-06-11
, 04:40
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jun 2012
|
#1388
|
![]() |
2012-06-11
, 08:52
|
Posts: 32 |
Thanked: 39 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ London
|
#1389
|
@jpetrise, Oh, i see... sorry, i didn't realize that was your intention. And yeah, i have a bad habit of sticking my nose.. My apologies.
@Brudhu, just like jpetrise said, the way the app works is indeed efficient because it allows you to stay communicated as long as you don't quit the app.
![]() |
2012-06-11
, 11:01
|
Posts: 1,320 |
Thanked: 915 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1390
|
The Following User Says Thank You to godofwar424 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
godoftool, harmattan, is-a-miracle, nokia n9, spacker_thread, tarekgalal, toddler_daycare, toolcoderus, wazapp, whatsapp |
|