Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 3,841 | Thanked: 1,079 times | Joined on Nov 2006
#131
The one posting that looks true to me is the one by speculatrix - if there's to be wimax tablets, then
Originally Posted by speculatrix
wimax requires regional regulatory permissions, so I can see there will be national variants.
(Bold emphasis by me)
__________________
N800/OS2007|N900/Maemo5
-- Metalayer-crawler delenda est.
-- Current state: Fed up with everything MeeGo.
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#132
Originally Posted by m_sparks View Post
i don't think it's going to be a new tablet - i'm betting on the "two box" theory. A small "box" that will take care of translation between WiFi/bluetooth to the WiMax network. This "box" will also provide the subscriber authentication means (sim or whatever it is).
would be easy/inexpensive, and in my view the most important, enables WiMax for all tablets. (sarcasm: no-it's not a phone! )

<NOMEX flame suit ON!>

-Matt
You mean like a competitor for the Cradepoint Personal Hotspot (hopefully that, instead of their non-battery product (CTR I think?))?

I'd like to see it, I really would. I'd especially like to see it if they had a version for GSM carriers (GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSPA), a version for CDMA carriers (1x, EVDOr0, EVDOr1), and a WiMAX version. But I really doubt that's what Nokia is doing.
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#133
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
I'd like to see it, I really would. I'd especially like to see it if they had a version for GSM carriers (GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSPA), a version for CDMA carriers (1x, EVDOr0, EVDOr1), and a WiMAX version. But I really doubt that's what Nokia is doing.
The important question: how the hell is this any different than just carrying around a phone with your tablet? <_<
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#134
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
The important question: how the hell is this any different than just carrying around a phone with your tablet? <_<
Hopefully cheaper than a phone, I guess. And if it was WiFi, rather than BT, then there's comparatively few (and pricey) phones that could do it. Like this morning on engadget, it could help the poor little iPhone, too. Why either of these would motivate Nokia to produce one, of course, is an open question.
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#135
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
The important question: how the hell is this any different than just carrying around a phone with your tablet? <_<
1) Most of the US carriers don't have options for "0 voice service, unlimited data service" on your phone (T-mobile does, but only with smartphones).

2) Most of the US carriers I've seen make unlimited data for your phone more expensive ($75-$110/mo. total, even with a dirt cheap voice plan). And that may or may not cover a tethering option. In comparison, the mobile router products, like Cradepoint's offering (and a couple other vendors), use data cards or USB dongles, which tend to get a reasonable flat rate unlimited service from the carriers ($40-$60/mo. total). Oh, and, at least with T-mobile, that unlimited internet tier covers using VOIP, so you don't need to ALSO carry a phone if you don't want to: just use Skype on your NIT (if you find Skype's quality to be good enough).

3) It uses Wifi for the bridge between your NIT and the network. This means you don't have worry about buying a phone that has Bluetooth DUN or PAN, and even if it does have DUN, wondering if it will actually work with the NIT. It also means that you can have more than one such device (a camera with that wifi SD card, for example).

4) Some bluetooth phones make you hit "OK" or something on every bluetooth connection, even if the devices were already paired and trusted the last time you connected them. This means you have to physically handle the gateway device every time you use it. With the PHS, you only have to touch it if it's not actually turned on. If it's in the bottom of your backpack, but on and just waiting for you, then you don't have to touch it at all.


That's how it's different from (and IMO, superior to) just carrying around your phone to tether with your NIT.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to johnkzin For This Useful Post:
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#136
Originally Posted by Benson View Post
Hopefully cheaper than a phone, I guess. And if it was WiFi, rather than BT, then there's comparatively few (and pricey) phones that could do it. Like this morning on engadget, it could help the poor little iPhone, too. Why either of these would motivate Nokia to produce one, of course, is an open question.
Yeah, an iPhone with VOIP (someone is making VOIP software for it, right?) and a PHS device doesn't need to be tied to AT&T (or the single blessed iPhone vendor in your country). Though, at that point, you might as well go with the iPod Touch instead of the iPhone.

Might make it easy for Nokia to make money off of the people who love the iPhone/iTouch but hate AT&T.
 
Posts: 3,841 | Thanked: 1,079 times | Joined on Nov 2006
#137
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
4) Some bluetooth phones make you hit "OK" or something on every bluetooth connection, even if the devices were already paired and trusted the last time you connected them. This means you have to physically handle the gateway device every time you use it. [..]
That would indeed be very annoying. But that should also be considered a bug of the actual phone, and hopefully there aren't too many of those (it would also obviously make BT headsets quite tiring to use).

My cheap BT phone stays put in the pocket (a very small pocket), as it should be.
__________________
N800/OS2007|N900/Maemo5
-- Metalayer-crawler delenda est.
-- Current state: Fed up with everything MeeGo.
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#138
Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
2) Most of the US carriers I've seen make unlimited data for your phone more expensive ($75-$110/mo. total, even with a dirt cheap voice plan).
Somehow I don't think a device like this would be much cheaper.
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#139
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Somehow I don't think a device like this would be much cheaper.
Then you're not paying attention.

Cradlepoint PHS + Sprint EVDO USB dongle == $60/mo. for unlimited and unfiltered data.

($50/mo if you qualify for SERO)


MUCH cheaper than paying Sprint for a dirt cheap minutes plan + unlimited "phone as modem" (then you're looking at $100/month or more, depending on which options you get).
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#140
Great news! For me anyway. I just got added to the list of early testers for the wimax tablet. I can't wait!
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:53.