Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 428 | Thanked: 54 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Washington DC
#131
Originally Posted by dal View Post
I'm not totally convinced that this is true. I think there is a large overlap. It's this overlap that nokia will lose to apple.
nokia already lost those users from the get go. why? because most of those users will walk into a store and not find an IT to play with.
 
Posts: 246 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#132
so. is the n800 dead yet?

seriously... wtf nokia. get your sh*t together.

i'm just waiting for the meizu minione now. i'm so over this.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#133
Originally Posted by dal View Post
I definitely think that the ipod touch substantially reduces the potential market for buyers of the n800.
I think from now on the vast majority of consumers will look at the n800 as say "so what, an ipod can do that AND hold 16gb of media".


I'll bet Mark S's paycheck on it!
The key word where you are mistaken is "substantially". That just ain't gonna happen folks, for the very reasons iball and I have clearly stated.

Very small number of potential N800 users who would jump *wholesale* to iPod Touch. And in fact, based on some posts here, those are users who would buy the N800 by mistake and sell or return it eventually. So... no real dent there, sorry.

And those who think the number one communications device maker in the world is gonna roll over because Apple introduced a cute media player are out of their league in this discussion.

Different markets. Different devices. Different goals. Meaningless, miniscule overlap realistically.

For the life of me I cannot imagine why such a simple thing is so difficult for some to grasp.

And that wager is for anyone.
 
Posts: 76 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on May 2007
#134
I know I am off topic, but I don't want to start a new thread on this... For anyone that hastily bought an iphone prior to the price drop, Apple announced that they will be giving $100.00 credit to the early adopters. Considering I'm one of the putzes that falls into that category, I am quite impressed. Yes, I still did pay more for the device, but Apple being a company for profit, they did not have to offer anything. This is a decent olive branch.

Sorry to get off topic.
 
iball's Avatar
Posts: 729 | Thanked: 19 times | Joined on Mar 2007
#135
Originally Posted by E-ville View Post
The thing o remember here is hackers are totaly attracted to the iphone and now the touch , its sexy and a challange, like the psp.. hackers are going to do things with these two products that apple never even thought of doing... the hackers are going to make these into a very very attactive device for all us n800 users.
That's nice. I'd rather have more real programmers attracted to the N800 - like they currently are - than "hackers" with sloppy code practices.
And look at all those PSP "hackers": 99% of them do nothing more than create a theme, build something in pathetic LUA code, or do a silly/stupid modification to code someone ELSE has already done (i.e. "custom firmwares"). You can count on ONE HAND the number of true PSP programmers.
Don't you dare compare the pathetic circus the PSP programming "scene" has become with what is happening with Nokia's Internet Tablets.
The two cultures, users, and market couldn't be more different.

Originally Posted by E-ville View Post
look at the psp hackng scene, you have a smaller genera there and have pepole diong stuff with a totally locked product that are unbelievable..sony fights them every step of the way and the hackers always overcome them.
THe PSP "hacking scene" as you call it has a nice open-source SDK for it and lots of homebrew developer support to surmount any serious issues that programmers run into.
So does the N770/N800.
The iPhone/iPod Touch does NOT. And a future firmware update to those devices in the future could possibly (probably) break any "hacked" software made to run on them.

Originally Posted by E-ville View Post
Apple knew these would be prime argets for hackers and I bet there counting on it to propell ther device to new levels.
Any company who depends upon "hackers" anything to "propel" their device to new levels doesn't deserve to be in business because it would show they have no fcuking clue how to run a business.
Apple - like Sony if you look deep enough - gives two *****s about your so-called "hackers". Sales matter, period, and "hackers" anything does NOT sell a goddamn thing in the business world.
Functionality and ease-of-use right out of the box do.

You want an example? Fine. The GP2X series of handheld devices have paltry sales numbers yet they are marketed as good for "hackers" and based upon open-source. Problem is, the hardware they went with is pathetic and they haven't figured out yet to throw wi-fi and bluetooth on the damn things.
Now, the same could be said of the N800 but the N800 has at least three things the GP2X doesn't: better word-of-mouth and reviews in the press, better hardware, and better battery-life.

Seriously, with some of the comments I've seen in here lately looks like some of you need to either go to school or go back to school because a lot of you don't know the first damn thing about Basic Business 101.
 
iball's Avatar
Posts: 729 | Thanked: 19 times | Joined on Mar 2007
#136
Originally Posted by thomasdawes View Post
I know I am off topic, but I don't want to start a new thread on this... For anyone that hastily bought an iphone prior to the price drop, Apple announced that they will be giving $100.00 credit to the early adopters. Considering I'm one of the putzes that falls into that category, I am quite impressed. Yes, I still did pay more for the device, but Apple being a company for profit, they did not have to offer anything. This is a decent olive branch.

Sorry to get off topic.
Decent olive branch? You do know people have ripped apart the iPhone and done a parts pricing on them and found out that Apple is charging an unsubsidized price more than DOUBLE of what it cost to make them, right?
The only reason the price is dropping on the iPhone is due to Apple recouping their R&D and initial manufacturing costs in the first batch of sucke-um-early adopters.
Apple is basically telling you "Thanks, sucker, we made our mint off you here's a Benjamin. Now go spend it on some more of our products."
 
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#137
So iball, according to business 101, what is the desired endgame for nokia internet tablets? and how does iphone/ipod touch relate to it, if at all?
 
Posts: 1,513 | Thanked: 2,248 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ US
#138
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post

And that wager is for anyone.
But if Nokia cancels the IT, you don't have a paycheck, right?

But seriously, I agree that Nokia IT probably will not go away or at least there will be at least one more significant upgrade to it. They will play to their strengths to attempt to differentiate themselves, and will not try to be slicker or cooler in their SW development to match the iPod/iphone in that way, although there may be a nice google UI on the WiMax version. Likely candidates are increased connectivity i.e., WiMax (if Sprint doesn't stumble), 802.11n, bluetooth 2.1 and pairing improvements, etc., that Apple historically hasn't done. It will be interesting to see if and how there is an OVI tie-in. They may also speed up the next version which was probably going to be mid-to-late 2008 otherwise.

Interesting though how quickly they have become competitors - just the last 3 months. the iphone, then OVI, and now iPod touch. I know Nokia did not consider Apple to be a major competitor 12 months ago. It will be an interesting 2008, especially if Intel gets into the space with their MIDs.

The company that this might concern the most in the short term is not Nokia - it's AT&T (unless they already knew about it). Who is going to buy a iPhone (+2 yr AT&T contract) when you can get an iPod touch and your choice of phone for less? Especially if BT DUN is eventually supported.
 
Posts: 751 | Thanked: 522 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ East Gowanus
#139
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
So iball, according to business 101, what is the desired endgame for nokia internet tablets? and how does iphone/ipod touch relate to it, if at all?
I'm not iball and I don't know the answer but I think the N770/N800 thing was an experiment to see how open source community could work with a hardware manufacturer in reducing the traditional costs around the Nokia products. If you read Qgils and Ari's statements it seems that Nokia is quite pleased with what they were able to achieve and the costs involved in product launch and development. As for the future I think Nokias involvement in the whole MID movement with Intel etc is a good indication that they are not dropping out.
 
Posts: 225 | Thanked: 68 times | Joined on Feb 2006
#140
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Flareup, I re-read your post and I still come away with that same interpretation. Maybe I'm stupid instead of blind.

And the only time there will ever be anything "between the lines" in my posts is when I'm obviously hinting at something. Otherwise, they're meant verbatim.
ah well, with attitude like that best to add me to your ever-growing ignore list then mate!
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:55.