|
2010-12-01
, 16:37
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1392
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-12-01
, 17:13
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 24 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#1394
|
The Following User Says Thank You to AndyG For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-12-01
, 17:49
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1395
|
I do disagree about the bezel - I find the current Tab one only just big enough, preferring the iPad size (of bezel). I hated the look of the big bezel on the iPad when it was announced, but Apple knew what they were doing on this one imo
|
2010-12-01
, 17:58
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 24 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#1396
|
I can appreciate this. I just got the impression, when I was using the device, that the bezel could be eliminated. It is quite small, and almost impossible to hold the device using the bevel reliably.
The Following User Says Thank You to AndyG For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-12-01
, 19:20
|
|
Posts: 50 |
Thanked: 36 times |
Joined on Oct 2006
|
#1397
|
|
2010-12-01
, 21:16
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1398
|
I don't quite follow - if you don't hold the device using the bezel how do you hold it? Using just the edges+back?
The problem with a multi-touch display of course is that if you touch the actual screen as part of holding it, it registers as a "touch" and messes up input royally.
The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-12-01
, 21:33
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1399
|
|
2010-12-01
, 21:35
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#1400
|
Tags |
android envy, buzz..buzz buzz, core failure, crapdroid, galaxy fap, galaxy tab, ipad killer, samsung, tab trolls, tablet envy |
|
But digital magazines/newspapers may prove to be a major use case for some people. Of course, even a 10" screen for a newspaper may still be somewhat confining.
The major area that I can see a 10" being superior to 7" is web surfing. From experience, 7" is plenty, though there is more zooming than a 10" displaying a page a native resolution. Again, I wouldn't forgo portability for even this major function. While the 10" would likely be better, the benefit doesn't outweigh the convenience of having a 10" on you.
Forgive my ramblings... But I think that a 10" size is a better size for a laptop replacement and extended use. Though a 10"er is more portable than a laptop, it almost begs to be used in a similar way (though more flexible), in a stationary position as it is difficult to grip with one hand.
The 7" screen may work as a laptop replacement, though it's small screen would make it challenging to work for extended periods. My 9" netbook already is challenging enough! But I think the major problem for a netbook replacement isn't the size, but the edge-applications that traditional OSs have that mobiles don't have.
*off topic*
I wonder if the iPad 2 will have a 'retina' display. It could be possible with hardware downsampling for apps not designed for the high resolution (eg. a specialized API).
Man, I wish that I were a hardware manufacturer! I'm convinced I could craft a fantastic device, hardware and software alike. I believe it comes down to making good engineering and design choices, and above all, knowing how people interact with the device.