|
2010-05-12
, 06:08
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1412
|
The decision was very likely made higher up than the PCB design engineer. And odds are that testing (a separate function) was not rigorous enough to expose the problem.
|
2010-05-12
, 06:19
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#1413
|
The point i was trying to make is something you would very know about and that is how can any design engineer even allow this design to go past him without realising its defficiency himself so if your saying it went to an even higher level to get past quality then it just goes to show big holes exsist in the Nokia quality control dept.
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-12
, 06:58
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1414
|
You're missing my point.
I'm betting the design engineer had little control over component selection. I'm betting someone farther out and higher up from that role had ultimate say-so. That's based on both my own experience as a former PCB designer, product designer in general, and a former Nokia employee.
As for QA, it's not a single department. QA is broken down by functions and sites. The Nokia QA team I worked in did outstanding work-- the proof was in our exceptional on-time delivery combined with low field failure rates. I cannot speak for other Nokia QA teams.
|
2010-05-12
, 07:02
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1415
|
|
2010-05-12
, 07:16
|
Posts: 277 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#1416
|
In some countries (eg. UK) a fault that is due to manufacture or design must be repaired irrespective of any warranty that may or may not be in effect. In these countries Nokia will remain liable for up to something like 10 years - my guess is that Nokia hope the disposable nature of modern phones will ensure their liability is very much limited, but don't be put off should your N900 develop this fault and you're just out of warranty - it doesn't matter, it's still down to Nokia to fix, at no cost to you.
|
2010-05-12
, 07:51
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#1417
|
|
2010-05-12
, 08:51
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#1418
|
|
2010-05-12
, 16:53
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#1419
|
So are you telling me that the selection of usb ports to be used on the N900 design is the one and only port that was used?
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-12
, 22:42
|
Posts: 93 |
Thanked: 85 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Halifax
|
#1420
|
Tags |
bad design, broken, charging, failure, hardware, loose, microusb, microusb port, n900, nokia, part, port, repair, return, surface mount, usb, usb port, warranty |
|
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net