The Following User Says Thank You to dsmflyer For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-06
, 22:51
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#1422
|
|
2010-04-06
, 22:52
|
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 59 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Manchester, UK
|
#1423
|
|
2010-04-06
, 22:54
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#1424
|
The Following User Says Thank You to skunkonkrunk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-06
, 22:55
|
Posts: 169 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Portugal
|
#1425
|
i did dmesg but not sure what i need to look out for, had 900mhz for over 2 days
|
2010-04-06
, 22:56
|
Posts: 97 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1426
|
|
2010-04-06
, 22:58
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 113 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1427
|
|
2010-04-06
, 23:02
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#1428
|
That is correct.
I'm running mine at 750 MHz now. 800 seemed stable at first but after prolonged use caused crashes and apparently corrupted the rootfs. 900 MHz booted but froze almost immediately.
I recommend everyone to check the output of dmesg every now and then. If there are UBIFS (or other filesystem) errors or kernel warnings, you'll have to lower your clock frequency and (in case of filesystem corruption) possibly do a full reflash.
Many users seem to be very enthuasiastic about running at highest possible speed, so I'm expecting more cases of corruption and crashing soon. I can't be the only unlucky one
The Following User Says Thank You to kangou For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-06
, 23:09
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#1429
|
|
2010-04-06
, 23:19
|
Posts: 97 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1430
|
|
I'm glad I'm not the only unlucky one that can't hit the magical 900MHz mark ^^.