Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,523 | Thanked: 1,997 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ not your mom's FOSS basement
#1441
Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
Trisha, please READ this reply... To everyone else, sorry, but I think this is the only way to fix this at this point.



Yes, you can, if you bring them up in the appropriate forums and threads. You've been told several times that this is not the appropriate place to ask about things you're asking about, but you keep doing it.

And yes, by constantly interrupting the flow of the thread here, you do cause those working on things here to be interrupted in their work, making it harder. Minimally, it takes them longer to catch up on what's going on. Add your posts and replies people make, and it contributes a lot of time (possibly tens of minutes) that could have been spent doing real work.



And what makes you think we haven't all paid for our devices? None of your money made it to anyone posting in this forum! And I'm betting together, we spent more on all our devices here than you personally paid for your device.



Had I acted the way you've been acting here, I'd have not been taught anything. Acting like a child results in you being treated like one. This is not a school, nor is it a tech support line. You are not entitled to anything here. If you want to be treated with respect, you must show respect for those around you.

"GOD" provided none of us with knowledge. Knowledge is not given, it's learned. And to learn something, you must first be willing to sacrifice your own time and to listen to those who you ask questions of. People have answered your question, but you don't like the answer, keep insisting you're right, and that they must help you. That's not learning; that's being a stubborn brat.

Why can't you read the thread from the start, and read the answers already posted long ago? Why should we have to give up our time to repeat to you something that's already been talked about hundreds of times already? Why do you keep posting here when you've been told it's not the proper thing to do, or the place to do it?
Why do you insist on installing things you don't understand the function of?
This is the most relevant, true, detailed and eloquent reponse i've seen for weeks. A+
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to don_falcone For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,523 | Thanked: 1,997 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ not your mom's FOSS basement
#1442
Originally Posted by n70shan View Post
first of all eid mubarik to u tooo and thanks for wishing ok now as u problems and questioning are concerned,its not a problem at all ok u can ask and we should answer who ever knows what ever abut ur question ok so dnt hesitate and dnt look to others who tease u just let them be......! ok i welcome u and thank u to help us do increase our knowledge by spreading it to others.. love u dear
In contrast, this was the most inappropriate and almost wrong response to the issue at hand i've read so far.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to don_falcone For This Useful Post:
Posts: 73 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Aug 2011 @ Canada
#1443
Originally Posted by don_falcone View Post
In contrast, this was the most inappropriate and almost wrong response to the issue at hand i've read so far.
oh really? ok just cool down contrast is the beauty of descussion. anyway u always be criticising all. i hve noticed so far
__________________
i wana be like MAG.!!
 
Estel's Avatar
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#1444
Back on topic, please?

Originally Posted by colin.stephane View Post
compcache kernel patches & fmtx_lock_power patch from freemangordon
What about ones amongst us, (including me) using jacekowski's modified binary? We've fmtx already working on max power, so including such a path won't bring any "overwriting" harm?

This may be dumb question, but personally, I don't like overlapping "features". I'm asking this, cause chances are high, that many patches from here will end up in kp49.
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,960 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#1445
Originally Posted by Estel View Post
Back on topic, please?



What about ones amongst us, (including me) using jacekowski's modified binary?

We've fmtx already working on max power, so including such a path won't bring any "overwriting" harm?
It will, the default value set on system startup should be 112(the same as stock). You should change that in event.d script to the value you want it to be. The default can be changed too (to max of 120), it was me who insist on using 112 as default during installation.

This may be dumb question, but personally, I don't like overlapping "features". I'm asking this, cause chances are high, that many patches from here will end up in kp49.
While I fully agree that overlapping features is silly what about us not using the above mentioned binary?

fmtx .ko module exposes ioctls to userland for reducing and increasing power. Stock fmtxd uses those ioctls to manage fmtx power every time a charger/usb cable is connected to the device. The previous patch (the one from KP46) simply disables locking of sys/.../power_level , but does not prevent fmtxd to set power_level via ioctl.

Just for clarity - fmtx patch makes all fmtx power applications unneeded - once set, fmtx power level remains constant until reboot.

TBH i was not sure that fmtx patch should be included, but future maintainer's words were "release early, release often"
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,523 | Thanked: 1,997 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ not your mom's FOSS basement
#1446
Originally Posted by n70shan View Post
oh really? ok just cool down contrast is the beauty of descussion. anyway u always be criticising all. i hve noticed so far
As for the contrast, that was not your person i criticized but your opinion, so cool down as well. I have to detest the bold markups, i criticize only people that are clueless but at the same time (very) vocal, and "Indians". Which seem unfortunately congruent in 90% of all cases. Anything else to clarify?
 
Posts: 915 | Thanked: 57 times | Joined on Jun 2011
#1447
yoy people asked me to comment after reading the thread.that i did.i followed : talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=71879&page=140
i wanted to go back to kernel 477.how to do that? i followed the steps in that page and got this:
~ $ sudo gainroot
Root shell enabled


BusyBox v1.10.2 (Debian 3:1.10.2.legal-1osso30+0m5) built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.

/home/user # apt-get --reinstall install kernel-power=2.6.28-10power47 kernel-power-modules=2.6.28-10power47 kernel-power-flasher=2.6.28-10power47
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Version '2.6.28-10power47' for 'kernel-power' was not found
/home/user #
 
Posts: 55 | Thanked: 14 times | Joined on Dec 2010
#1448
I too would like to revert to v47 and get the same message as trisha; following instructions posted somewhere earlier in this thread. I looked in the git repo as well but the last version I see is v46. Anyone have a clear idea for how to do this?

Please don't tell me to research because I have...

any help would be appreciated. thanks in advance.
 
Posts: 172 | Thanked: 63 times | Joined on Jun 2010
#1449
Anyone else noticed that connecting to internet fails many times after kernel48, n900 connects like after 10 tries. i would like to revert back to 47 how can i do that ?
 
Posts: 915 | Thanked: 57 times | Joined on Jun 2011
#1450
same here...i faced the internet problem too
 
Reply

Tags
battery-status, bq27x00_battery, kernel, kernel-power, misiak4king, noobs-cant-read, pali4president, patches, readdirections, revolverspinyou


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:40.