|
2010-08-17
, 08:05
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#1462
|
thanks....just got the time to deal with this. i did the enable logging and the text file attached is the .log file (i honestly dont know what that 76000 char txt file is )
i perform a back-up before i delete and re-do my mfe, but still same results. thanks
UPDATE: with some unexplainable reasons on my part, my mfe just re-sync! i mean it is working now!, before that, the warning banner says that Exchange account was disabled......then after that, the mfe folder was synced
The Following User Says Thank You to Rob1n For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-08-17
, 16:49
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#1463
|
Anyway, glad to hear it's all working now - make sure you disable logging again though, otherwise you'll soon run out of rootfs space!
|
2010-08-17
, 17:56
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#1464
|
|
2010-08-17
, 18:39
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#1465
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Rob1n For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-08-18
, 00:46
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#1466
|
You've uninstalled sysklogd? The rootfs space usage shouldn't be anything to do with logging then - have you checked to see where the extra space is being used (if it's fixed at reboot then it's probably under /tmp, as that'll get cleaned on boot)?
apt-get remove sysklogd
|
2010-08-19
, 01:01
|
Posts: 958 |
Thanked: 483 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#1467
|
|
2010-08-19
, 01:43
|
Banned |
Posts: 706 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#1468
|
|
2010-08-19
, 01:45
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#1469
|
Good idea. Here is the deal: I ssh into my phone so that I can do the dbus-monitor in the background. I pipe it into a file and then click on an email in the inbox. I get a long delay during which dbus-monitor is pumping out tons of these:
These look remarkably like the list of integers at the beginning of the file /var/lib/gconf/apps/modest/accounts/Mail@32@for@32@ExchangeID/%gconf.xml:Code:method call sender=:1.71 -> dest=org.freedesktop.Notifications serial=99757 path=/org/freedesktop/Notifications; interface=org.freedesktop.Notifications; member=CloseNotification uint32 163 signal sender=:1.31 -> dest=(null destination) serial=99227 path=/org/freedesktop/Notifications; interface=org.freedesktop.Notifications; member=NotificationClosed uint32 163 method call sender=:1.31 -> dest=com.nokia.HildonSVNotificationDaemon serial=99228 path=/com/nokia/HildonSVNotificationDaemon; interface=com.nokia.HildonSVNotificationDaemon; member=StopEvent int32 165 method return sender=:1.31 -> dest=:1.71 reply_serial=99757 method call sender=:1.71 -> dest=org.freedesktop.Notifications serial=99758 path=/org/freedesktop/Notifications; interface=org.freedesktop.Notifications; member=CloseNotification uint32 162 signal sender=:1.31 -> dest=(null destination) serial=99230 path=/org/freedesktop/Notifications; interface=org.freedesktop.Notifications; member=NotificationClosed uint32 162
I don't know if the list is exactly the same, and if it is growing at all (though the update timestamp on the xml file is current, so it has been updated). So what is generating these notifications? If I delete the "li" nodes, will I break something? Will they get replaced?Code:<?xml version="1.0"?> <gconf> <entry name="notification_ids" mtime="1281391489" type="list" ltype="int"> <li type="int" value="163"/> <li type="int" value="162"/> <li type="int" value="160"/> <li type="int" value="159"/> <li type="int" value="158"/> <li type="int" value="157"/> <li type="int" value="156"/> <li type="int" value="155"/> <li type="int" value="154"/> <li type="int" value="153"/> <li type="int" value="152"/> <li type="int" value="151"/> <li type="int" value="150"/> <li type="int" value="149"/> <li type="int" value="148"/>
I would love to hear any thoughts from anyone (including whether I should put all this into a new or existing bug in the maemo bugzilla) before I go around deleting from gconf files willy nilly. I pulled the modest source code from the repository (open source rocks!) but have not found anything of interest related to notifications, or to the dbus call above...but I have only started pouring through it.
|
2010-08-21
, 23:00
|
Posts: 48 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#1470
|
Tags |
activesync, certificate, email, exchange, fremantle, ignore tex14, maemo 5, mail for exchange, mfe, n900, provisioning, sync, thanks vitaly! |
|
i perform a back-up before i delete and re-do my mfe, but still same results. thanks
UPDATE: with some unexplainable reasons on my part, my mfe just re-sync! i mean it is working now!, before that, the warning banner says that Exchange account was disabled......then after that, the mfe folder was synced
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!
"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"
N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
Last edited by gabby131; 2010-08-17 at 01:59.