Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (8)
to Nokia N900 by whayong - 10 hrs, 17 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 6 hrs ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to ndi For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-04
, 00:42
|
|
Posts: 455 |
Thanked: 278 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Oregon, USA
|
#142
|
You're damned-right Nokia is not competing in the current smartphone market.
Hell, at least Apple is responsive about quickly fixing USABILITY BUGS. Something Nokia shoves under the 'monolithic' releases that take 4 months and waiting..
Hell, at least Apple is responsive about quickly fixing USABILITY BUGS. Something Nokia shoves under the 'monolithic' releases that take 4 months and waiting..
 |
|
2010-05-04
, 00:42
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#143
|
Originally Posted by Texrat
Well, depends. More US, less so in other parts of the world. Around here, there's always been a sort of "level" one needs to be before getting a certain job, and this more the rule than the exception (there are plenty exceptions).
It depends. When things are booming experience is paramount and degrees can be unnecessary.
Still, the majority of businesses (especially above a few employees) require a certain degree as specs when announcing a job opening and don't even interview without those requirements.
True, however, that our education system is (was) a bit different, more linear. We have since adhered to international standards, substantially lowering the bar for a batch of degrees.
I agree, however, that the scenario listed has more to do with layoffs or restructuring than actual level mismatch.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
|
|
2010-05-04
, 00:44
|
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#144
|
Originally Posted by Texrat
Well the overqualified thing is usually linked to pay. Not to mention some organizations are afraid to hire people with higher degrees since they may be resistant to being trained (or at worst, may ditch the company the moment the find a better opportunity).
It depends. When things are booming experience is paramount and degrees can be unnecessary. My bachelor's degree was interrupted due to family obligations but until last year it was never a hinderance in getting a job that paid well above what my AAS should have warranted-- even at Nokia. I got credit for experience, certification, etc. But last year with the economic meltdown all that went out the window. I'm really lucky I fell into a job at all. Some of my former colleagues have not been as fortunate, oddly being told they're overqualified while lacking "the proper degree".
Nuts.
Although the same thing can apply to people with lots of experience.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss
They're maemo and MeeGo...
"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 |
|
2010-05-04
, 00:55
|
|
Posts: 275 |
Thanked: 389 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sydney
|
#145
|
Originally Posted by gom4381
My number one pet hate in today's share holder focussed operation of companies. Why the incessant need to grow profits? Huge profits are stile huge profits and if someone doesn't increase their profits the company gets devalued by a drop in share prices. Something is REALLY wrong, but then again I am a liberal, open-source endorsing scientist who values decency not greed.
As quoted from Engadget,
stagnant profit growth
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GreatGonzo For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2010-05-04
, 01:02
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#146
|
Originally Posted by GreatGonzo
Because the company projects increase of revenue/marketshare/profit in their quarterly reports?
My number one pet hate in today's share holder focussed operation of companies. Why the incessant need to grow profits? Huge profits are stile huge profits and if someone doesn't increase their profits the company gets devalued by a drop in share prices. Something is REALLY wrong, but then again I am a liberal, open-source endorsing scientist who values decency not greed.
Because most current valuations already take into account future growth?
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc
Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!
|
|
2010-05-04
, 01:02
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#147
|
Expand or die isn't a suggestion. Everyone expands and if you don't you die eaten. All the decent companies are now part of an unscrupulous megacorp. So, grain of salt.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
|
|
2010-05-04
, 01:07
|
|
Posts: 66 |
Thanked: 70 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Paris
|
#148
|
Originally Posted by Texrat
I think its a mistake to imagine these kinds of decisions are taken to improve the quality of the work being done. A recession is an opportunity to weaken the hands of the workforce.
It depends. When things are booming experience is paramount and degrees can be unnecessary. My bachelor's degree was interrupted due to family obligations but until last year it was never a hinderance in getting a job that paid well above what my AAS should have warranted-- even at Nokia. I got credit for experience, certification, etc. But last year with the economic meltdown all that went out the window. I'm really lucky I fell into a job at all. Some of my former colleagues have not been as fortunate, oddly being told they're overqualified while lacking "the proper degree".
Nuts.
Demanding high quaifications and preferring low experience is one way of doing this. Now you and many others like you feel lucky to have a job at all and still others wish they had one. This in turn puts pressure on even those with the currently desired qualifications.
If a company doesnt taken these opportunities it grows fat and becomes vunerable to takeover.
|
|
2010-05-04
, 01:18
|
|
Posts: 275 |
Thanked: 389 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sydney
|
#149
|
Actually the article mentions stagnant profit growth, which means the profit growth isn't increasing which make the whole thing even more absurd. This is assumes you build in an exponential model into the planning. Oh dear....
 |
|
2010-05-04
, 01:23
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#150
|
Originally Posted by nicola.mfb
Not that I am singling you out or anything, but what the numbers suggest is precisely the inverse: the market is going towards getting smartphones to the masses (C-6 and its cousins, they practically cost nothing to Nokia). That is why RIM gets good numbers quarter after quarter, that is why Microsoft launched its Kin phones. Let´s remember that Nokia sells almost more smartphones than HTC, RIM and Apple combined.
The problem is not *now*, but where the market is going, failing on the future bets may resolve in a complete disaster.
Peoples cry becouse the C-6 release will not make Nokia rich, while investing the C-6 R&D on maemo/meego will make them happy
They try to correct nokia mistakes to have more effort on maemo/meego to have them dominate the world market just to be sure that it will supported/enhanced for ever
Niko
The touch-screen luxury phone market is small and has fierce competition. If you (eventually) don't get to the masses, you will not succeed. That is why Palm ended up being bought by HP, that is why Motorola is crashing; and that is why Apple extended its operations overseas and started giving the iPhone the features the world demanded. You can have 1 or 2 "Apples" in that segment, but not more.
So what Nokia is going to do mostly there, is to release one or two flagships there, for the sake of "saluting the flag", as we say here. There is where MeeGo comes in.... hopefully in time, with enough polish, features, services and specially, innovation.
__________________
Hola! Soy un Guía de Maemo!.
Vínculos interesantes si nos visitas por primera vez (en inglés): New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Si te puedo ayudar con cualquier otra cosa, sólo dilo!
Hola! Soy un Guía de Maemo!.
Vínculos interesantes si nos visitas por primera vez (en inglés): New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Si te puedo ayudar con cualquier otra cosa, sólo dilo!
 |
| Tags |
| ceo firing, fooled again |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48.
They still don't have the hang of it. Monolithic "firmware" releases is the best sign you are in the wrong age.
When a sued and broken-into-pieces behemoth like MS releases daily for closed source, the bar is pretty high.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.