vi_
|
2011-11-21
, 13:23
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#141
|
The Following User Says Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-21
, 14:11
|
Posts: 1,808 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Germany
|
#142
|
|
2011-11-21
, 15:53
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#143
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-21
, 19:13
|
Posts: 268 |
Thanked: 1,053 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#144
|
I have found a bug in BB-P. In the last version of BackupMenu Robbie was kind enough to add a framebuffer console. This allows you to access the console through BM. One problem...
Without BB-P it works fine.
With BB-P it gets as far as asking for your username then crashes back to the BM main menu when you press return (to enter your username). It gives the error: "applet not found". This is the BB error for when a BB applet has been called but does not exist. Useually the name of the erroneously called applet is given in the error (foobar: applet not found). With BB-P installed there is no name supplied.
I can confirm it is the BB-P package as if I remove it (apt-get uninstall) then try root console again it works, re-install, it fails.
The last line in BM when console is selected is:
I assume BB then has to run 'login' or 'logon' or whatever and it is somehow failing. I don't really know my understanding of how a new shell is spawned is a bit...uh...thin.Code:busybox getty 115200 tty1 sh
The more I think about it the more i think this implies there is something with BB-P 'getty' applet.
iDont, how is BB-P installed these days? Is the original binary still there? Can I change my 'getty' symlink to point to the old binary to test this?
MOAR!
The more I look, the more I see getty has been changed from v1.15->v1.19.
Looking at the source they both #include the exact same files so potentially getty.c v1.15 could be substituted for getty.c v1.19. While it may work it doesn't explain why there is an issue (assuming it is even getty that is the problem) after all, all the changes to getty.c have been simple bug fixes right? RIGHT??
|
2011-11-21
, 20:42
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#145
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-21
, 22:59
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#146
|
What surprises me is that you're the first one to report this, while the latest BackupMenu has been released in back in July.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-22
, 19:52
|
Posts: 268 |
Thanked: 1,053 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#147
|
To be honest, I've been fighting with this issue for some time, and reported it in backupmenu thread. Unfortunately, got no idea that busybox could cause it - it was just about limits in my knowledge/experience here, I suppose.
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to iDont For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-23
, 16:14
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
|
#149
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SeT For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-23
, 17:39
|
Posts: 2,225 |
Thanked: 3,822 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Florida
|
#150
|
hi))
In "ls" output russian characters shows as ????, how to fix it?
On default BusyBox all good
cd ~/MyDocs touch файл ls [file name came out as ????????] /opt/busybox-power/busybox.original ls ./ [file name came out as файл]