![]() |
2013-06-11
, 14:30
|
|
Posts: 1,986 |
Thanked: 7,698 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Dayton, Ohio
|
#141
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-11
, 20:55
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#142
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-12
, 08:12
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#143
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-12
, 09:27
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#144
|
Speaking about details - I thinked about it carefully, including situation, when one of torch modes is already enabled, and user click "ON/OFF" button assigned to another torch mode. IMO, this should result in disabling previous torch instantly, and activating last one "clicked" (literally, toggling between normal and indicator torch).
The Following User Says Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-12
, 12:10
|
|
Posts: 1,986 |
Thanked: 7,698 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Dayton, Ohio
|
#145
|
1. Sadly, "exit on camera cover close" options doesn't work. I've tried restarting Lanterne after enabling it, to no avail. It seems, that this option is just ignored.
2. In morse code tab, text imput field is missbehaving, if one hits "return" after writing sentence to send (I did it intuitively, wanting to check if it will be same as hitting "Start transmitting" button).
3. In strobe flash experimented, input field for duty cycle time is strange, too. Using hardware keyboard, I can write max 999 ms there (three digits), but via software buttons, I can set as much as 5000 ms.
Furthermore, there is something wrong with that duty settings. On 5000 ms and 25% duty cycle, leds remain ON for same ammount of time, as with 3000 ms. Increasing it above certain level seems to only affect pause time.
UI design observation here. "new" settings, utilizing duty cycle time and duty cycle percentage are in line with wikipedia's definition, but, in real life usage, "old" way of setting ON time and pause time was *much* more convenient and intuitive.
UI design suggestion - please, split "torch ON/OFF" button into two, wide in half.
Then, let first one remaine "torch ON/OFF", and make another "Indicator ON/OFF".
Speaking about details - I thinked about it carefully, including situation, when one of torch modes is already enabled, and user click "ON/OFF" button assigned to another torch mode. IMO, this should result in disabling previous torch instantly, and activating last one "clicked" (literally, toggling between normal and indicator torch).
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-12
, 12:57
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#146
|
Originally Posted by EstelYes, and it was much more flexible as well. Dangerously flexible.
BTW, UI design observation here. "new" settings, utilizing duty cycle time and duty cycle percentage are in line with wikipedia's definition, but, in real life usage, "old" way of setting ON time and pause time was *much* more convenient and intuitive. I don't know for others, but I opt for reverting it.The advantage of the "duty cycle" mechanism is that it shows you exactly where the danger is -- the higher the duty cycle, the greater the chance of damage to the LEDs. I'll look at providing other UI options, but I at least want to keep the duty cycle value somewhere, to let you know if you're in dangerous territory.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-12
, 15:24
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#147
|
Alternatively, replace the now superfluous "use indicator led as torch" checkbox with "allow using both LEDs simultaneously". I am thinking hard to come up with a situation when one would want to have both the white and the red LED on at the same time though.
Question: do you have the "Ignore camera cover status" option checked? If so, Lanterne will ignore the camera cover. This includes not closing the app when the camera cover is closed...
Yes, and it was much more flexible as well. Dangerously flexible.The advantage of the "duty cycle" mechanism is that it shows you exactly where the danger is -- the higher the duty cycle, the greater the chance of damage to the LEDs. I'll look at providing other UI options, but I at least want to keep the duty cycle value somewhere, to let you know if you're in dangerous territory.
How about keeping the duty cycle but providing a dynamic info line showing what it translates to in absolute terms.
Ah, yeah, I've been trying to work out how best to do something like that. The big issue here is how to make it work in both landscape and portrait mode. The way I've got it now, Qt automagically resizes all the buttons for me; but splitting the buttons horizontally works better in landscape, and splitting them vertically works better in portrait. I'm still trying to find a way to customize landscape and portrait modes without being too cumbersome.
(...)
Actually, I'd prefer to have a generic White/Red switch somewhere, so that all the choices (Torch/Pulse/SOS/Morse) pick up the color switch once, rather than forcing each button to be split...
The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-12
, 15:40
|
|
Posts: 1,986 |
Thanked: 7,698 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Dayton, Ohio
|
#148
|
I wonder, couldn't Lanterne ignore camera cover state for purpose of turning LEDs off, but respect it for closing whole application at change from open to close (this and only this) state?
Why not keeping more flexible ms - ms settings, and showing dynamically adjusted field with resulting duty cycle% (as non-imputable field, just a "calculated result", based on what we put into ms values)?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-12
, 15:50
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#149
|
Why not keeping more flexible ms - ms settings, and showing dynamically adjusted field with resulting duty cycle% (as non-imputable field, just a "calculated result", based on what we put into ms values)?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-12
, 16:36
|
Posts: 2,292 |
Thanked: 4,135 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#150
|
Hey, your idea with generic white/red switch is very good, it should be there instead of my proposed "indicator ON/OFF" button. As for landscape/portrait dillema, I would just split last button horizontally (ala landscape) - as said, even in portrait, they're going to be big enough for being comfortable.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to sixwheeledbeast For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
flashlight, lanterne, morse code, nokia n900, strobe light, torch |
|