The EPIC N9 anticipation thread - Page 154 - maemo.org

Active Topics

The N900 is now 15 years old! (8)
to Nokia N900 by whayong - 10 hrs, 16 mins ago
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 6 hrs ago
more...

Page 154 of 736

154

Thread Tools

	tissot	2011-05-20 , 17:59
	Posts: 1,839 \| Thanked: 2,432 times \| Joined on May 2009	#1531

Originally Posted by EIPI

My recollection was that it was leaked before MWC (which was September), i.e. sometime in August, not just before Maemo Summit (which was October 2009).

http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=290

I can't really member the exactly how it went but there was certainly rumors about it before the Maemo Conference.

Eldar just offered pictures, features, review, whatnot just before it got announced.

EDIT:

Originally Posted by NvyUs

They gave N900 about 20 second Air time at Nokia World the week after they just shoved its official announcement on Nokia Conversations, they really was not interested in marketing it at all, they gave all stream time to N97 Mini.
http://events.nokia.com/nokiaworld09...-solutions.htm

Very true.

I wonder just how many got in to it because of the 2 awesome youtube adverts that where launches right after the announcement.
Hyped so many of us who had been waiting the device for long long time.

Quote & Reply |

	Brock	2011-05-20 , 17:59
	Posts: 490 \| Thanked: 296 times \| Joined on Nov 2009 @ Hannover-Germany-EU-Earth	#1532

Originally Posted by Koajwujwer123

Come on .. you really expect me to answer that

anonymous...

what do all of you thing who did leaked the teaser?? it was anonymous...

Quote & Reply |

	qwazix	2011-05-20 , 18:00
	Moderator \| Posts: 2,622 \| Thanked: 5,447 times \| Joined on Jan 2010	#1533

Originally Posted by Den in USA

This was a popular thread back then:

http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=25456&page=17

that sounds fun, even more than todays thread because ther is a lot more to speculate on software
________
redhead girl Webcams

Last edited by qwazix; 2011-08-21 at 10:57.

Quote & Reply |

	qwazix	2011-05-20 , 18:04
	Moderator \| Posts: 2,622 \| Thanked: 5,447 times \| Joined on Jan 2010	#1534

I don't remember where I saw it for the first time, but even I loved symbian then (had a N95 and 5800) I knew I wanted one. So five or six days after it appeared in a local retailer I went for it.
________
Web shows

Last edited by qwazix; 2011-08-21 at 10:57.

Quote & Reply |

	qwazix	2011-05-20 , 18:09
	Moderator \| Posts: 2,622 \| Thanked: 5,447 times \| Joined on Jan 2010	#1535

by the way there were a lot of times I went to a phone store to ask the price of the N900 only to be told it doesn't exist. ?Do you mean the N97 sir??
________
GROUP LIVE

Last edited by qwazix; 2011-08-21 at 10:57.

Quote & Reply |

	Brock	2011-05-20 , 18:20
	Posts: 490 \| Thanked: 296 times \| Joined on Nov 2009 @ Hannover-Germany-EU-Earth	#1536

Originally Posted by misterc

so why take it off line again?
the videos would come out next week, perfectly legally on youtube, by those lucky few who got one, giving all the details away.
what f#cking difference does it make whether the video was leaked a week earlier or @ all?
none, which so ever!
thus
FCC certification + (leaked ~ teasing) video = consumer phone

it surely makes a difference... If it wouldnt, companys wont need to make a NDA. E.g. think about apple and informations about new devices. They would do the same if a teaser about a future phone is leaked. Regardless if it will be sold in a week or a month. Thats normal business, because they want to get all attantion when it is officially announced. rumors can be good for devices, but to much rumor can be fatal for a new device

Quote & Reply |

	misterc	2011-05-20 , 18:21
	Posts: 1,625 \| Thanked: 998 times \| Joined on Aug 2010	#1537

Originally Posted by misterc

well, this is the same argument about the proof of the (non-)existence of something that can't be seen. the absence of observation is no proof of the non-existence.
the fact it can't be seen may simply be due to the fact that we look in the wrong place / at the wrong device (which all the discussion about TWO devices was about, in a way...)
unless there is a 2nd device, obviously, there is a keyboard.

any proof of the existence of a 2nd device?
anyone?

well, i presented my evidence & there doesn't seem to be any contender, so i'll provide a couple reasons why i believe the RM-680 will be the consumer device and the only Maemo / MeeGo dev. this year (thus that developers will have to live w/ that device too).
the two reasons are actually one, supported by two top NOKIA exes.
i hope they won't get fired because they provided evidence for the non existence of something the company didn't plan to sell in the 1st place?

1st Elop said there'd be one MeeGo device this year.
he didn't say only one because even only one is already too much for his taste, but, well, he said so.
and i guess he would definitely be the one to nip in the bud any 2nd MeeGo device (that would divert resources from Wx devices, obviously)

2nd Rich Green.
for the sake of simplicity i'll refer to an earlier post where i already presented the evidence provided by Rich Green (NOKIA's CTO) (more in an effort to prove that NOKIA's vision extended beyond LostDOS se7en Paralysed then to prove there would only be one MeeGo dev this year, but one MeeGo device seems to be all that he's talking about and all that's needed...)
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...9&postcount=24

still, anyone, any tangible evidence of a 2nd MeeGo device this year?

Quote & Reply |

	misterc	2011-05-20 , 18:25
	Posts: 1,625 \| Thanked: 998 times \| Joined on Aug 2010	#1538

Originally Posted by Brock

it surely makes a difference... If it wouldnt, companys wont need to make a NDA. E.g. think about apple and informations about new devices. They would do the same if a teaser about a future phone is leaked. Regardless if it will be sold in a week or a month. Thats normal business, because they want to get all attantion when it is officially announced. rumors can be good for devices, but to much rumor can be fatal for a new device

i already replied to that in a previous post today...
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=911

Originally Posted by misterc

[...]
the teaser was available what, three days on Youtube...
more then enough time for everybody to wake up, hear about it, get home, look it up & watch it. two times over.
do you really thing it would have taken NOKIA three days to get it off the air if they didn't want it there in the 1st place?

the only reason not to leave it on line eternally is because it was showing the one and only MeeGo device we'll get from NOKIA this year & it will be a CONSUMER device. good that ppl have a good chance to have a good look @ it, not good they get bored with it
(remember Apollo 13, the 3rd mission to the moon? it didn't even get on television before the explosion... "getting to the moon isn't that exciting anymore"

)

if it is only a developer device, what does NDA matter?

Last edited by misterc; 2011-05-20 at 18:37.

Quote & Reply |

	Dave999	2011-05-20 , 18:31
	Posts: 7,075 \| Thanked: 9,073 times \| Joined on Oct 2009 @ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side	#1539