Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
debernardis's Avatar
Posts: 2,142 | Thanked: 2,054 times | Joined on Dec 2006 @ Sicily
#151
I really hope it's possible to go under the shiny glossy appearance. Otherwise I won't buy an iphonokia!
__________________
Ernesto de Bernardis

 
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#152
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Let's look at it another way. How many people with very modular desktops ever upgrade them (install a new graphics card, CPU, hard drive, whatever)? How many people with modular laptops ever upgrade them (RAM, hard drives, wireless connectivity, whatever)?

I don't have any hard numbers to back this up (other than observing friends, family, and coworkers), but I'd say very few people ever upgrade their computers. They're much more likely to simply purchase new machines.
The modularity of PCs is I believe mostly historical. It did help to bring costs down when the components were specialized and very expensive (I'm talking 8086 and 80286 days here), but in the meantime the lifetime and cost of said components decreased to the level that often the interface is more expensive than the silicon. This effect is even strengthtened by the kitchensink approach of modern chipsets/PoPs. With the advance of 'good enough' computing, even PCs succumbed to that trend - see the all-in-ones that are starting to appear and that have, IMHO a good chance of replacing the vast majority of current, super-extendable boxy PCs. Apple got this figured out long ago - integrated for the masses and componentized for pros. Mid-high level graphics cards are probably the only component that has a solid reasoning (e.g. choice of chips, SLI/crossfire, etc), everything else is/has gone to motherboard or USB/firewire.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 968 | Thanked: 974 times | Joined on Nov 2008 @ Ohio
#153
Originally Posted by GeraldKo View Post
I don't plan on spending big bucks like you have to for iPhone connectivity. If Nokia is coming out with two models, and both enable a cellular data connection, my hope is that Nokia has cut a deal to allow it to be used with a cheap, prepaid data solution, analogous to T-Mobile's prepaid phone card, for those of us who are generally happy to rely on WiFi.

If I had my druthers, Nokia would also come out with a non-celldata-capable, no-hardware-keyboard model -- that is, an N800 that was faster and smaller than the original (while keeping the same screen size and resolution), and cheap. It would be the iTouch-competitor for people who are willing to sacrifice a little (though not as much as currently required) on bulk in order to gain a bigger, and 800x480, screen.

And, yeah, as far as I'm concerned, I'd prefer a stylus, too. But even if Nokia dumps the stylus, if they can make an interface with the sensitivity to make a finger as precise as a stylus, I'd still like this new Son-of-N800.


Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Let's propose something else. What if, instead of a costly (to the customer) modular option Nokia offered several different devices for the Maemo platform. Each with a different set of options, some lower-end, some higher (much like Nokia's current cellular phone lineup).

That way, you could pick the device that suits you (say, the lower-end $250 tablet without 3G, accelerometers, FM RX/TX, GPS, or a hardware keyboard etc.) and somebody else could pick the device that suits them ($600, all the fixin's, hardware keyboard, etc.) and you're both happy without having to deal with the modularity compromise (which is a big one to swallow on mobile devices).
Firstly, I don't have an Iphone or even a data contract Probably 90% or better of my time is spent in areas where I have wifi coverage. Basically, the only time I don't have coverage is in the car, and I'm generally not using my tablet then.

You both have hit on what I'd like to see Nokia do. A high end "fully loaded" model and a much cheaper "economy" model.

If I had my preference, a N800 like model, perhaps with a keyboard, no cellular data, lower quality camera, not required (but would be nice): gps, fm rx/tx, accelerometers. I'm thinking more like $350 versus $600. Not a base model, but not fully loaded either.

There are too many non-direct (net-books, etc) competitors in that $200-$400 price range for Nokia to ignore it. On the other hand, if I could get fully loaded for under $400, I guess I could live with that.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lemmyslender For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,950 | Thanked: 1,174 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Seattle, USA
#154
Originally Posted by GeraldKo View Post
At least for the United States, you have to figure that Nokia is working hand-in-hand with a carrier (or carriers) to compete with Apple/AT&T. More than we wish, the carriers have a say in what gets built.
Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
Perhaps not. Lots of other non-phone devices have SIM card slots: UMPCs, MIDs, netbooks and laptops. Do the carriers get a say in how they are built? Do the carriers there control what Microsoft can do when running on them?

...

I wouldn't be expecting the primary sales route for the Maemo 5 devices to be through mobile phone retailers and carrier contracts.

I think they'll be sold as high-end, unlocked, unsubsidised devices primarily.

There's something I don't understand then. (OK, one of many things I don't understand.) There was all this talk about how Apple had to make a deal with AT&T to let the iPhone use its spectrum more freely. First Apple approached Verizon, but Verizon wouldn't let Apple open it up for uses not controlled by the carrier. It wasn't just that Apple wanted a deal where AT&T would also be an iPhone seller and would subsidize the purchases; there was a big deal made about AT&T giving up control of the uses of the spectrum. (Was all this changed during the wrangling when Google was threatening to buy up bandwidth at auction?)


Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
Earlier comments by Nokia, shortly after the Maemo 5 announcements, were along the lines that adding the cellular hardware didn't add much to the end price, and that you wouldn't have to use it.
Doesn't this contradict General Antilles' remarks that
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
... applications are being designed to assume a data connection
?
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#155
Originally Posted by GeraldKo View Post
Doesn't this contradict General Antilles' remarks that
?
Hardly. You don't have to use it but it doesn't mean your experience wont be slightly impaired.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 
krisse's Avatar
Posts: 1,540 | Thanked: 1,045 times | Joined on Feb 2007
#156
Perhaps they dropped the stylus keyboard because they expect it to have a physical keyboard?

Perhaps the screen will be physically so large that there is no need for a stylus-only keyboard (i.e. the finger keyboard will only take up a small portion of the screen)?


I'm speculating that there will be no physical pencil-like stylus and stylus holder in, on or around the product. Has qgil said otherwise? A guitar pick dangling from a string doesn't count.
The 5800 has a stylus built-in, the plectrum is an optional phone charm mainly there because of the 5800's full name (5800 XpressMusic).

I have had a 5800 for several months now and I've never used the stylus at all, it just sits in its compartment.

Incidentally, the next touchscreen S60, the N97, has no stylus at all. It uses the same OS and screen resolution as the 5800, but it has a physically larger screen so perhaps Nokia feel that large screen devices have less need for styluses because everything is more finger-sized.
 
daperl's Avatar
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#157
Originally Posted by krisse View Post
Perhaps they dropped the stylus keyboard because they expect it to have a physical keyboard?
Nokia gave me a stylus and a keyboard for my n810.

Perhaps the screen will be physically so large that there is no need for a stylus-only keyboard (i.e. the finger keyboard will only take up a small portion of the screen)?
If I can hold it in one hand I'll be using a stylus.

The 5800 has a stylus built-in, the plectrum is an optional phone charm mainly there because of the 5800's full name (5800 XpressMusic).
My last car came with a guitar and 3 plectrums. I think my horn is middle C.

I have had a 5800 for several months now and I've never used the stylus at all, it just sits in its compartment.
I've had my n810 for several months and I don't use the keyboard. Sometimes my son likes me to slide it open so he can look at the pretty buttons.

Your 5800 vs. n810 thread inspired me to take a closer look at my current gadgets. Notice my phone is slightly larger than the 800x480 screen. That's all I need. If Nokia would make the screen close-to-flush with the edges and put all the buttons on the side I would be very happy. (The n800 screen is the same size as the n810 screen.)

Name:  img_2370.jpg
Views: 587
Size:  38.5 KB
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 
krisse's Avatar
Posts: 1,540 | Thanked: 1,045 times | Joined on Feb 2007
#158
Originally Posted by daperl View Post
Your 5800 vs. n810 thread inspired me to take a closer look at my current gadgets. Notice my phone is slightly larger than the 800x480 screen. That's all I need. If Nokia would make the screen close-to-flush with the edges and put all the buttons on the side I would be very happy. (The n800 screen is the same size as the n810 screen.)
The thing is, that's sort of what they're doing with the N97. The resolution isn't quite as good as the tablets, but it's pretty close. Here's one of the official pics to give an idea of scale:

http://conversations.nokia.com/wp-co...-nokia-n97.jpg

This is a pure guess, but I would assume (or hope!) that because the N97 is already covering the N810-size territory, they'll move Maemo devices onto the market for even larger devices, approaching netbook-size.
 
daperl's Avatar
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#159
Originally Posted by krisse View Post
The thing is, that's sort of what they're doing with the N97. The resolution isn't quite as good as the tablets, but it's pretty close. Here's one of the official pics to give an idea of scale:
I like the N97. I hope it's a big hit. What makes it undesireable for me is:
  • It's going to cost $600 - $800
  • It's going to be using an ARM OMAP2 processor
  • It's going to be running Symbian
This is a pure guess, but I would assume (or hope!) that because the N97 is already covering the N810-size territory, they'll move Maemo devices onto the market for even larger devices, approaching netbook-size.
That would be a bummer for me. Unless Nokia is going to increase the resolution, which doesn't seem to be the case, I actually want the tablets to get smaller.

You might find this strange, but some of us are using our tablets as desktop computers. Not because we can, but because the devices can. But we're not looking for netbooks; we're looking for pocketbooks.
__________________
N9: Go white or go home

Last edited by daperl; 2009-04-26 at 23:51.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,950 | Thanked: 1,174 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Seattle, USA
#160
Krisse, how about those of us who don't want a cellphone but want a pocketable device with 800x480 resolution? You throwin' us to the wolves?

Also, don't you think Nokia wants to compete with the iPod touch?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to GeraldKo For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
i want my mtv, pass the butter, pub talk, wet dreams, wishful thinking


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:29.