|
2009-05-25
, 18:54
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
|
#152
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to spock For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-05-25
, 18:57
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#153
|
Since the specs we have have the hardware keyboard, accelermoter, 3G, and GPS, that implies it is the HIGHER end device. Would it make sense for the higher end device to have a smaller screen and the lower end device to have a bigger screen?
|
2009-05-25
, 18:57
|
Posts: 1,208 |
Thanked: 1,028 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#154
|
|
2009-05-25
, 18:57
|
|
Posts: 259 |
Thanked: 59 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#155
|
|
2009-05-25
, 18:59
|
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 182 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Leeds UK
|
#156
|
|
2009-05-25
, 19:00
|
Posts: 179 |
Thanked: 1,679 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#157
|
It has been my hope that the whole reason for opening the Maemo project to the public was to observe how people will use Maemo devices and deduce the main use cases from these observations. To me (personally) it seems to be a much better idea than mandating a bunch of use cases and forcing them onto potential users.
Reading books is certainly one of the main use cases, if you take into account that FBReader has been downloaded 13652 from maemo.org alone. And yes, 4.1" is definitely better than 3.5" for reading books.
Again, while we do not know what display makes sense for watching movies, it seems to be a commonly held opinion that 4.1" is better for watching movies than 3.5".
The third use case I mentioned (web browsing) is officially the main use case for the current crop of internet tablets. As it also loses some experience quality from shrinking the display size, I can't help but wonder whether it is still among the main use cases for the upcoming device(s)?
|
2009-05-25
, 19:01
|
Posts: 137 |
Thanked: 138 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#158
|
I'm honestly giggling at how incensed some people are getting over 0.6". If, in fact, 3.5" is "useless," "dealbreaker," etc then 4.1" has to have been pretty marginal to begin with. I completely disagree. Apologies to those of you with poor eyesight -- honestly maybe you should be looking at a bigger device. Someone said they are tired of carrying around three devices (phone, camera, tablet) and I'm right there with you. This or the n97 honestly would do a good job of being that "one" device, and it's going to take some tradeoffs to get there. I'm thanking my lucky stars that the resolution didn't need to drop in order to get there.
I'm still confused about the dpad though. What will I use to scroll around? Vim keybindings?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to chlettn For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-05-25
, 19:01
|
Posts: 179 |
Thanked: 1,679 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#159
|
|
2009-05-25
, 19:02
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#160
|
I'm honestly giggling at how incensed some people are getting over 0.6". If, in fact, 3.5" is "useless," "dealbreaker," etc then 4.1" has to have been pretty marginal to begin with.
Tags |
disapointed by nokia, dpad, maemo phone, my tablet is crying, n900, nokia gets it wrong, openmoko, rover, rx-51, rx-71 needed, screen size, smartphone, t-mobile |
|
Net browsing, smaller screen more side scrolling, pretty annoying already
Watching films, holding it closer isnt an option, its downright uncomfortable
Reading books, totally impossible on a smaller screen
Office tasks, much faster in the n900 I'm sure but pointless because I cant see more than 2 lines of text at a time
All in all I'm more likely to buy mobile broadband for my phone and teather my n810 by bluetooth. I was waiting for data to be intergrated but its just not worth it. There is nothing that the n900 is usable for (i.e. all the above uses are out) that my current mobile doesnt do.