ukbill69
|
2010-02-06
, 00:45
|
Posts: 39 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#151
|
|
2010-02-06
, 03:59
|
Banned |
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 60 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#152
|
|
2010-02-06
, 04:24
|
|
Posts: 290 |
Thanked: 132 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ New York City
|
#153
|
|
2010-02-06
, 04:38
|
Posts: 328 |
Thanked: 101 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#154
|
|
2010-02-06
, 05:28
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#155
|
|
2010-02-06
, 05:42
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#156
|
|
2010-02-06
, 06:15
|
Posts: 152 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Sydney
|
#157
|
|
2010-02-06
, 06:37
|
Posts: 27 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ By the swamp
|
#158
|
|
2010-02-06
, 06:52
|
Posts: 310 |
Thanked: 383 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#159
|
I love it!!! I would like a much better email client and the random rebooting to cease, but the rapid development of it so far through the community and Nokia gives me great hope all this will be addressed soon enough.
Even with these issues, it is fantastic!
|
2010-02-06
, 07:40
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 97 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#160
|
As a newcomer to the forums and a n900 owner the reactions to this thread baffle me. A thread like this could have been a opportunity to take a cold hard look at any problems with maemo 5 & n900.
Of which I doubt any of you can call perfect. Nevertheless we see "glowing" comments to it's greatness(which makes me doubt the sincerity of the post) with only a couple obvious(to me)truthful comments. This tells me that some people in this community have some insecurities in regard to the n900 but why ? If it's as good as some have claimed couldn't it stand up on it's own merits ? Without attacking someone ? It just reminds me of the apple community at times and I don't think that's what we are looking for here. No device is without it's flaws, period. I'll offer up my honest heart felt assestment well more of a overview.
The n900 with maemo5 as a platform should be great but the device was launched missing functionality promised or indicated to be coming later. MMS, front facing video cam(cam disappear of tech spec list) are 2 important things that fall into this dilemma. Nokia gave every indication that they were working hard on the n900 and some features didn't make the launch window timeframe but would come after launch. But after launch we get a updates to prepare us for the ovi store.
I can't speak about it too much because I didn't update, but wouldn't a pure bug fix mms update go further rather then access to a service(+ a few updates) that they themselves admit needs to be changed and updated ? When you factor in that some amount of fixes are being being pushed into maemo6 then it starts to get scary if maemo6 isn't made available for n900, I for one would prefer a more stabile maemo5.
I can't go into bugs too much because I refuse the update, I shouldn't have to agree to anything for Nokia to give me the features it advertised. Even if they have to offer it as a straight firmware enabler/driver update with no additional update with the OS that would be more acceptable.
As far as being a phone the n900 lacks some basic functionality. As for being a MID it certainly packs a punch but it's always overshadowed by what it could be. And lastly in regards to redpill it was a mistake to remove it, even though I never really used it the end result is a loss of function and control of my device. If it really had a exploit of some sort then fix the problem and leave the functionality. The whole bricking your device isn't reason enough, I'm a big boy I can take it if I brick my device I'd replace it so add a disclaimer and let it be.
Honestly to me it just had a certain cool factor to it but anyway this is getting too long. So my answer would be for all of the stated reasons and specifics I didn't think it would be fair of me to get into yes I regret my purchase, it's nice but very incomplete.