Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 15 hrs, 10 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 6 days, 3 hrs ago - more...
|
2011-03-23
, 09:27
|
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#152
|
by the way, there's a keyboard shortcut for automatic video, but I can't seem to find one for automatic camera
 |
|
2011-03-23
, 09:49
|
|
Posts: 1,637 |
Thanked: 4,424 times |
Joined on Apr 2009
@ Germany
|
#153
|
There is none. Just p/l/m/n for portrait, landscape, macro and night.
__________________
my contributions:
Desktop Clock Widget|Calendar Home Widget|Lens Cover Reminder|ConnectNow|Scout|App Search Widget|ProfilesX|
Desktop-Switcher|SMS-Messageblocker
-Donate-
my contributions:
Desktop Clock Widget|Calendar Home Widget|Lens Cover Reminder|ConnectNow|Scout|App Search Widget|ProfilesX|
Desktop-Switcher|SMS-Messageblocker
-Donate-
|
|
2011-03-23
, 09:53
|
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#154
|
oh
it would be nice if you added one for automatic camera
it would be nice if you added one for automatic camera
|
|
2011-03-23
, 12:16
|
|
Posts: 515 |
Thanked: 259 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#155
|
I've uploaded 3 files at iSO 800 , 1/15 sec so you can see FCam vs Camera-UI2 output. These are 100% crops. It's rather interesting because the exposures are fairly similar but the white balance is completely different. The Camera-UI2 output is noisier but the white balance is perhaps more accurate.
The first is the JPEG output for reference, the second is the Camera-UI2 and the third is FCAM
Last edited by geohsia; 2011-03-23 at 12:22.
The first is the JPEG output for reference, the second is the Camera-UI2 and the third is FCAM
Last edited by geohsia; 2011-03-23 at 12:22.
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to geohsia For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-03-23
, 12:49
|
|
Posts: 1,637 |
Thanked: 4,424 times |
Joined on Apr 2009
@ Germany
|
#156
|
The camera-ui2 output looks sharper.
__________________
my contributions:
Desktop Clock Widget|Calendar Home Widget|Lens Cover Reminder|ConnectNow|Scout|App Search Widget|ProfilesX|
Desktop-Switcher|SMS-Messageblocker
-Donate-
my contributions:
Desktop Clock Widget|Calendar Home Widget|Lens Cover Reminder|ConnectNow|Scout|App Search Widget|ProfilesX|
Desktop-Switcher|SMS-Messageblocker
-Donate-
|
|
2011-03-23
, 14:22
|
|
Posts: 650 |
Thanked: 497 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
@ Ghent, Belgium
|
#157
|
Originally Posted by nicolai
I think that is just a difference in focus
The camera-ui2 output looks sharper.
__________________
Affordable mobile internet in Belgium: Try Mobile Vikings
2 GB, 1000 SMS and 15 euro of talk time for.... 15 euro
Affordable mobile internet in Belgium: Try Mobile Vikings
2 GB, 1000 SMS and 15 euro of talk time for.... 15 euro
|
|
2011-03-23
, 14:48
|
|
Posts: 1,378 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Göteborg, Sweden
|
#158
|
Originally Posted by petur
I agree - look towards the end of the temple (the ear rest, if you like), that band is more in focus in the fcamera than camera-ui2 shot.
I think that is just a difference in focus
Talking of focus: that tap selectable focus circle option in fcamera is a really nice utility. The focus box in camera-ui(2) is quite large and can struggle to lock correctly. For example, focussing across a table with a few objects can be tricky. Nicolai's new focus distance display goes a long way in helping assess where is the focus, particularly at short range. Thanks for that.
|
|
2011-03-23
, 15:52
|
|
Posts: 515 |
Thanked: 259 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#159
|
Originally Posted by nicolai
Others have already replied I should have done a better job on focus.
The camera-ui2 output looks sharper.
I ran both photos through RAW Therappee it seems like RAW Therapee works better with FCam DNGs and Lightroom a bit better with Camera-UI2 DNGs. RAW Therappee is the best in terms of noise reduction.
| The Following User Says Thank You to geohsia For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-03-23
, 23:01
|
|
Posts: 1,637 |
Thanked: 4,424 times |
Joined on Apr 2009
@ Germany
|
#160
|
Originally Posted by geohsia
At least I can make more options for the ISO value.
It is difficult to really compare side by side unless I am able to set options manually ISO (> 400) and shutter speed.
I uploaded a new version (see first post).
You can use the keyboard control (key "i") to cycle
through the Automatic/100/200/400/800/1600 ISO setting.
Nicolai
__________________
my contributions:
Desktop Clock Widget|Calendar Home Widget|Lens Cover Reminder|ConnectNow|Scout|App Search Widget|ProfilesX|
Desktop-Switcher|SMS-Messageblocker
-Donate-
my contributions:
Desktop Clock Widget|Calendar Home Widget|Lens Cover Reminder|ConnectNow|Scout|App Search Widget|ProfilesX|
Desktop-Switcher|SMS-Messageblocker
-Donate-
| The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to nicolai For This Useful Post: | ||
Camera-UI2 can't seem to go higher than ISO 800. Strangely FCAM RAW files have less noise. The noise at around ISO 3000 (FCAM) is easier to manage than ISO 800 (Camera-UI2). It is difficult to really compare side by side unless I am able to set options manually ISO (> 400) and shutter speed. I will try to profile the Camera-UI2 output and see if that makes a difference.
The OOTC JPEGS still seems to be the best. I wonder if it does some dark frame subtraction.