[Announce] kernel-power stable v49 in Extras-Testing - Page 160 - maemo.org

Active Topics

The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 6 hrs, 42 mins ago
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 19 hrs ago
more...

Page 160 of 300

160

Thread Tools

Seker_94	2011-09-16 , 21:35
Posts: 195 \| Thanked: 96 times \| Joined on May 2011	#1591

i totally agree with Mohammad
++ they are really effective

i just feel sorry for some people telling wrong things

Quote & Reply |

	Estel	2011-09-17 , 01:36
	Posts: 5,028 \| Thanked: 8,613 times \| Joined on Mar 2011	#1592

Originally Posted by Mohammad

people i don't wanna be off topic very much
but i saw some posts about speedpatch and batterypatch

@Estel and others saying wrong facts about the patches
you said most of the reported problems by users of speed/battery patches

batterypatch is still UNSTABLE and may cause reboots because if the voltages inside of it
finding the most stable voltages are in progress i think

and finally

TBH !!! these two patches are effective with me
and no one please tell me that they are placebow b*llsh**

You're just plain wrong, to say at least, but You're free to remain in this position

Rationale: amount of people downloading it isn't any proof, that these settings are sane + that it does what it say it does. AFAIK no real measurements have took place, instead of plain subjective "observations". also, ther eis nothing about beta stage or voltage inside it (wtf?!) - it just contain of many uncertified, unchecked and untested "tweaks", some overlapping over another from the same package.

But, it's *not* place to talk about so called "speed/batter patch", no matter if in terms of real measurement, or in Your "fanboy" manner. If You're interested, please post in "speed/battery patch" thread.

__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!

Quote & Reply |

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
colin.stephane, ivyking, maacruz, reinob

cincibluer6	2011-09-17 , 01:51
Posts: 345 \| Thanked: 127 times \| Joined on Sep 2010	#1593

Originally Posted by cloudstrife1ph

how do you remove kernel power v47 in the multiboot list?

i want to remove it because it won't open anymore. probably because v48 is already installed.

Edit the multiboot file.

Code:

leafpad /etc/multiboot.d/11

Save it and exit. Good to go on next boot.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cincibluer6 For This Useful Post:
Estel, seawall

Mohammad	2011-09-17 , 07:49
Posts: 105 \| Thanked: 49 times \| Joined on Jul 2011	#1594

Originally Posted by Estel

You're just plain wrong, to say at least, but You're free to remain in this position

Rationale: amount of people downloading it isn't any proof, that these settings are sane

Estel i didn't say that more than 7000 people are happy with it
cause the downloads are more than 7000 <you can check your self

anyway i said 200 people according to the number of thanks
i don't wanna go further with this

so i won't post anymore about them

Quote & Reply |

cloudstrife1ph	2011-09-17 , 21:34
Posts: 250 \| Thanked: 44 times \| Joined on Jan 2010	#1595

Originally Posted by cincibluer6

Edit the multiboot file.
Code:
leafpad /etc/multiboot.d/11
Save it and exit. Good to go on next boot.

i copied this one on xterm then it opened leafpad. there's no text or whatsoever so i don't know what to edit. when i'm attempting to save it, it appears as 11(1) as a file name. when i try to remove the (1) to overwrite the previous file, it says can't open file to write...

Quote & Reply |

michaaa62	2011-09-17 , 21:48
Posts: 2,102 \| Thanked: 1,937 times \| Joined on Sep 2008 @ Berlin, Germany	#1596

Originally Posted by cloudstrife1ph

i copied this one on xterm then it opened leafpad. there's no text or whatsoever so i don't know what to edit. when i'm attempting to save it, it appears as 11(1) as a file name. when i try to remove the (1) to overwrite the previous file, it says can't open file to write...

Use <TAB> to complete the file name in your terminal command.

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to michaaa62 For This Useful Post:
seawall

	willi6868	2011-09-18 , 11:34
	Posts: 548 \| Thanked: 562 times \| Joined on Aug 2011 @ Germany	#1597

Has anyone an idea how i can fix my reboot problem caused (i think so) by power kernel?

http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=1580

Quote & Reply |

efeinblatt	2011-09-20 , 09:23
Posts: 60 \| Thanked: 3 times \| Joined on Jan 2010	#1598

Too smart for my own good. OK, so I finally started playing around with kernel-power, finding just the right combination of smart reflex and overclocking frequencies and under volting and everything was working great until I decided to go a little further and explore some of the local files to see what was actually happening. I never chose to make any combination a 'default', preferring the flexibility of a reboot and resetting the overclocking parameters anew. However, I did something in qcpufreq that created a default file, and I wanted to find where it was.

So, /etc/default/kernel-power looked to be the source of the default. I opened it with leafpad just to have a look, but didn't change anything. Now everything is screwed up.

uname -r shows me that kernel-power v48 is installed
kernel-power show and kernel-power load lv comes back with kernel-power not found.

So, I try to deinstall and reinstall.
apt-get install --reinstall -y kernel kernel-flasher gets me the message that reinstallation is not possible kernel and kernel-flasher cannot be downloaded. Same story when I try to do it automatically with Nokia Kernel.

Help!