![]() |
2010-07-15
, 15:15
|
|
Posts: 675 |
Thanked: 923 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#1602
|
Thanks, but that's not it.
This might better explain what I'm trying to do.
While you in a call, instead of putting the phone to your face/head, just hold it in your hand. Then use your thumb to cover up the proximity sensor, you'll noticed that the display will be switched off rather quickly (by design). Moving your thumb away from the sensor will then power up the display again...but there's a delay.
There's a time difference between the speed of turning the display on, and turning the display off. Off is a lot quicker...
What I would like to achieve is to make the response time shorter when the display comes back on.
![]() |
2010-07-15
, 15:21
|
|
Posts: 601 |
Thanked: 549 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Redditch, UK
|
#1603
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Switch_ For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-15
, 15:36
|
|
Posts: 675 |
Thanked: 923 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#1604
|
Search before you go starting a new thread, I saw one only the other day and added my ten pence into it. I believe it would be a D-bus call that increases the polling rate to the proxy sensor, but I'm a) no linux buff and b) no coder, so I can't do it. Technology savvy, can work Photoshop fine no worries, but when it comes to this techie coding stuff I'm in well over my head.
May be issues with increasing the polling rate to the sensor too in terms of battery usage and the like. Besides, it'll eat up processor cycles and might cause lag when answering calls and during chat etc. No doubt some incredibly clever Linux guru will be able to answer the question, I'd be looking to qwerty12 or MohammedAG for an answer to this question....
![]() |
2010-07-15
, 18:58
|
|
Posts: 675 |
Thanked: 923 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#1605
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to D4rKlar For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-15
, 19:07
|
|
Posts: 1,635 |
Thanked: 1,816 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Manchester, England
|
#1606
|
![]() |
2010-07-15
, 19:17
|
|
Posts: 675 |
Thanked: 923 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#1607
|
ooops, i accidentally a whole magic thing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjSrwpbxyAM
![]() |
2010-07-15
, 19:23
|
|
Posts: 1,635 |
Thanked: 1,816 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Manchester, England
|
#1608
|
![]() |
2010-07-15
, 20:00
|
|
Posts: 1,161 |
Thanked: 1,707 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Denmark
|
#1609
|
ooops, i accidentally a whole magic thing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjSrwpbxyAM
![]() |
2010-07-15
, 20:12
|
|
Posts: 1,635 |
Thanked: 1,816 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Manchester, England
|
#1610
|
![]() |
Tags |
maemo mods, mods thread |
|
This might better explain what I'm trying to do.
While you in a call, instead of putting the phone to your face/head, just hold it in your hand. Then use your thumb to cover up the proximity sensor, you'll noticed that the display will be switched off rather quickly (by design). Moving your thumb away from the sensor will then power up the display again...but there's a delay.
There's a time difference between the speed of turning the display on, and turning the display off. Off is a lot quicker...
What I would like to achieve is to make the response time shorter when the display comes back on.