|
2011-09-22
, 04:55
|
|
Posts: 4,365 |
Thanked: 2,467 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Australia Mate
|
#1642
|
|
2011-09-22
, 05:12
|
Banned |
Posts: 778 |
Thanked: 337 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#1643
|
|
2011-09-22
, 05:18
|
Posts: 915 |
Thanked: 57 times |
Joined on Jun 2011
|
#1644
|
|
2011-09-22
, 05:42
|
Posts: 133 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Balzan Malta
|
#1645
|
The Following User Says Thank You to luketanti For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-22
, 06:23
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,960 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#1646
|
|
2011-09-22
, 07:50
|
Posts: 1,808 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Germany
|
#1647
|
|
2011-09-22
, 07:56
|
Posts: 650 |
Thanked: 497 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
@ Ghent, Belgium
|
#1648
|
i had kp48.it was not stable and as far as i remeber i read many posts in this forum and also other forums,it has nt been stable for others as well.it drained more battery and few other problem which i dint understand(being a noob).so many developers or not noob people urged them(including me) to stay with kp47. i hope this kp49 is much more stable in draining less battery ( rather save more power if possible) and solve few other problems. but one question. y kp48 wasnt updated which made it unstable rather a new version popped out.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to petur For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-22
, 08:26
|
Posts: 1,523 |
Thanked: 1,997 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ not your mom's FOSS basement
|
#1649
|
Well, that is not what my impression is.... As far as I understand, most people think KP48 is rock stable, and so it behaves here too. The few cases you see could easily be caused by 1) pushing the device beyond what it can handle or 2) simply pebkac
|
2011-09-22
, 08:30
|
Posts: 915 |
Thanked: 57 times |
Joined on Jun 2011
|
#1650
|
Tags |
battery-status, bq27x00_battery, kernel, kernel-power, misiak4king, noobs-cant-read, pali4president, patches, readdirections, revolverspinyou |
|
it is still true?