Active Topics

 


Page 17 of 158 « First 71516 17 181927 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
kalim13 is offline kalim13
2009-11-30 , 15:38
Posts: 46 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#161
Hi Vitaly,

Could you elaborate on this please.

does the certificate need to be on the Nokia n900? if so what certificate is it and if it is not currently on there, where can i download it from?

i'm getting the following error

"exchange account disabled. access refused"

this is at first synchronisation.
 
vitaly_repin's Avatar
vitaly_repin is offline vitaly_repin
2009-11-30 , 16:45
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#162
Originally Posted by kalim13 View Post
does the certificate need to be on the Nokia n900?
If your server uses trusted certificate than nothing shall be done on a client (N900) side.

if so what certificate is it and if it is not currently on there, where can i download it from?

i'm getting the following error

"exchange account disabled. access refused"

this is at first synchronisation.
It is better to ask your Exchange server administrator for help. Just explain your IT guys that Nokia N900 does not accept the certificates which are not trusted. They shall deliver the certificates to you. And you can install them using maemo file manager - simply open certificate from it. Keep in mind, "Certificate Authority" field shall not be empty as otherwise it will not be allowed to install this certificate.
 
TA-t3 is offline TA-t3
2009-11-30 , 16:49
Posts: 3,841 | Thanked: 1,079 times | Joined on Nov 2006
#163
Hm, are you saying it's not possible to download the certificate from the application itself?

Many companies use self-generated certificates, as the certificates you pay for is simply a scheme to get you to pay money for nothing. And yearly, at that.

With e.g. email clients in Maemo 4 you just download the certificate once, at first connection.

Or am I misunderstanding how this works in mail for Mfe?
__________________
N800/OS2007|N900/Maemo5
-- Metalayer-crawler delenda est.
-- Current state: Fed up with everything MeeGo.
 
vitaly_repin's Avatar
vitaly_repin is offline vitaly_repin
2009-11-30 , 16:53
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#164
Originally Posted by TA-t3 View Post
Hm, are you saying it's not possible to download the certificate from the application itself?
MfE is not responsible for the certificate management in the platform. It uses platform-wide certificate storage.

There is no feature to download certificate using MfE, sorry.
 
kyle is offline kyle
2009-11-30 , 16:56
Posts: 66 | Thanked: 44 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#165
Originally Posted by ewan View Post
Ah, missed that. It's clearly not true to say that it's 'illegal' though. Not compliant with the spec, maybe, but not illegal.
No, it really would be illegal. A breach of contract. Nokia had to license the technology from Microsoft. If they did this, then their license would be revoked and they would likely get sued.
 
vitaly_repin's Avatar
vitaly_repin is offline vitaly_repin
2009-11-30 , 16:57
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#166
Originally Posted by fouro View Post
Or would it be too much hassle to create it this way (aka might require two different lines for MfE for updates etc). This naturally would bring the best of both worlds and let user to decide it.
I am not sure that having 2 different packages can help much here. The simpler way to implement and maintain it is to have an option somewhere in the UI "support provisioning". If it is turned on, device is provisionable. Otherwise it is not.

Having 2 packages addresses exactly the same issue but in not so natural way. Keep in mind, nothing prevents the user from selecting which package to use. Even if company has installed the package with provisioning support to the user, he or she can easily remove it and install the version without this support.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to vitaly_repin For This Useful Post:
mrojas's Avatar
mrojas is offline mrojas
2009-11-30 , 17:06
Posts: 733 | Thanked: 991 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#167
Originally Posted by vitaly_repin View Post
My answer is here: http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=133

But again, regardless of my personal opinion about this feature if there is a demand for having this **** on board, why not? We are not doing politics here, we are doing business :-)
I think that an admin is more likely to not change its policy about provisonable devices.

So if an admin does not change the policy, and you need Exchange Mail, it leaves the user in a dead-end situation.

Is it possible to make the provisonable feature something you can enable or disable on the device? That way people that use Exchange with more permitting policies can keep their data safe.
__________________
Hola! Soy un Guía de Maemo!.

Vínculos interesantes si nos visitas por primera vez (en inglés): New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Si te puedo ayudar con cualquier otra cosa, sólo dilo!
 
vitaly_repin's Avatar
vitaly_repin is offline vitaly_repin
2009-11-30 , 17:08
Posts: 320 | Thanked: 763 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Espoo, FInland
#168
Originally Posted by shujaa View Post
To a great extent it's working great and with exchange 2010 to confirm that question!
Cool! Good to know. Feel free to post any Exchange 2010 here, pls. It is not supported officially but...

- Better exchange calendar integration i.e. I receive a meeting request, I can accept it and it subsequently add's it to my calendar (device and exchange) and sends a response to the meeting organizer.
- Unread email count on mailbox screen (maybe a counter next to the title)
- Fewer steps to get to inbox. E.g. launch email>selecmailbox>go directly to inbox and skip folders. The palm pre does this very well and it's quite useful
- Autoload of images
- Different color for priority mail (e.g. make the email red in the inbox)
Thanks for the very detailed comments.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to vitaly_repin For This Useful Post:
SubCore's Avatar
SubCore is offline SubCore
2009-11-30 , 17:57
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#169
Originally Posted by mrojas View Post
Is it possible to make the provisonable feature something you can enable or disable on the device? That way people that use Exchange with more permitting policies can keep their data safe.
For the N900 with its Linux platform, it is quite difficult to fullfill the criteria for "provisionable devices" the way microsoft imagines them. it would require many additional concessions on the OS side, not just in MfE, which makes it really hard to implement in an open OS like Maemo.
therefore i don't expect this situation to change until Harmattan (Maemo 6) gets released, which will provide a DRM-mode, making it far more likely for nokia to be able to fullfill microsoft's criteria for this.

edit:
vitaly (one of the developers of MfE) explained a very good reason in the other thread.
Last edited by SubCore; 2009-11-30 at 18:02.
 
kalim13 is offline kalim13
2009-11-30 , 19:03
Posts: 46 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#170
Originally Posted by vitaly_repin View Post
They shall deliver the certificates to you.
Would you have anymore information as to what certificates they need to forward?

thanks
 
Reply
Page 17 of 158 « First 71516 17 181927 Last »

Tags
activesync, certificate, email, exchange, fremantle, ignore tex14, maemo 5, mail for exchange, mfe, n900, provisioning, sync, thanks vitaly!

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:37.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top