Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
R-R's Avatar
Posts: 739 | Thanked: 242 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Montreal
#171
from:
http://mobile-review.com/review/noki...-n900-en.shtml


Any reasons why the apps space is so small?
Hopefull we don't go back to a 256MB internal storage space for the / fs, tell me we do have a full 32GB!!
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#172
Originally Posted by R-R View Post
Any reasons why the apps space is so small?
Hopefull we don't go back to a 256MB internal storage space for the / fs, tell me we do have a full 32GB!!
Because he's using an older build with a different partition arrangement.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post:
Posts: 206 | Thanked: 72 times | Joined on Jun 2009 @ Switzerland
#173
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Because he's using an older build with a different partition arrangement.
The internal memory, with 32G, is mounted in /home/ ?
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#174
Originally Posted by korbé View Post
The internal memory, with 32G, is mounted in /home/ ?
The current layout as I understand it (all pre-release specifications are subject to change, of course):

32GB eMMC
  • 768MB of swap
  • "Over" 1GB of ext3 mounted on /opt
  • Remaining space mounted on /home/user/$MYDOCS as FAT32
256MB NAND
  • Bootloader
  • Kernel
  • rootfs
MicroSD
  • FAT32 partition
__________________
Ryan Abel
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post:
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#175
ugh, i truely wish that some regulatory office would slap microsoft into including a open, unpatented FS in future os's, and pushed out ASAP as a update to existing ones, and make sure it follows the specs to a t, both present and future, no extensions or omissions...
__________________
Be warned, posts are often line of thoughts at highway speeds...
 
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#176
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
32GB eMMC
  • 768MB of swap
  • "Over" 1GB of ext3 mounted on /opt
  • Remaining space mounted on /home/user/$MYDOCS as FAT32
Wait a tic... How is this going to help applications ? Don't tell me we have to shove everything in /opt...
 
dansus's Avatar
Posts: 279 | Thanked: 208 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ London
#177
After watching Peters videos, couple of questions came to mind..

How is notifications handled. ie if im in the browser and an IM or tweet comes in, will something pop up like the Pre?

Im guessing the usb is host, so can i just plug in a usb key and it will show up as mass storage?
 
Posts: 206 | Thanked: 72 times | Joined on Jun 2009 @ Switzerland
#178
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
The current layout as I understand it (all pre-release specifications are subject to change, of course):

32GB eMMC
  • 768MB of swap
  • "Over" 1GB of ext3 mounted on /opt
  • Remaining space mounted on /home/user/$MYDOCS as FAT32
256MB NAND
  • Bootloader
  • Kernel
  • rootfs
MicroSD
  • FAT32 partition
Thanks.

A posibility to format 32G internal memory on ext2/ext3 ?
 
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#179
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
Wait a tic... How is this going to help applications ? Don't tell me we have to shove everything in /opt...
Presumably yes (unless someone finally produces a realistic unionfs for Linux and makes it available as a module on Maemo).

But that isn't so bad, icons and desktop file in /usr/share and application code, images, translations in /opt/application.

This is all conjecture though, as Nokia haven't announced yet how they intend developers to use /opt (although it's being left a little late!)
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#180
Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
As GeneralAntilles points out in the thread qole links to, I'm not being sloppy with language here - and thought the difference between these two statements would be clear. Perhaps I should have made the first and the inverse of the second:
  1. Nokia does not support host mode.
  2. The N900 does not permit host mode.

The word "support" in the question was not the word the questioner was looking for - it's too vague and has too many meanings in IT.
Yep, the word "support" is probably the most misused word in tech support, in my experience. Even the people who use it frequently don't understand what they are saying.

What it usually means is, "hey, you may be able to do that, and more power to you if you do, but we aren't going out of our way to help you and we take no responsibility for how well you do it."

People misinterpret it thus: "well, you don't support it, so you obviously oppose it," like we were talking some sort of political process. It doesn't mean that. Often, technicians themselves use this line of reasoning to chase away people who are trying to do something, like "we told you we don't support that, and if you are having problems now, it's your own fault" as if people trying to do it are somehow immoral.

Users who do something that isn't supported are perfectly free to do so, but they can't expect help from a company that has announced that it won't help. That is all that "we don't support that" means.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09.