Reply
Thread Tools
Jack6428's Avatar
Posts: 635 | Thanked: 282 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Black Mesa Research Facility
#1791
So is there any way to play 480p videos on YouTube on the N900 or not?
 
Posts: 343 | Thanked: 165 times | Joined on Sep 2010
#1792
This thread has gone nowhere really fast.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mattbutsko For This Useful Post:
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#1793
Originally Posted by mattbutsko View Post
This thread has gone nowhere really fast.
180 pages is fast?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Posts: 155 | Thanked: 92 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ Jordan
#1794
I must be the only one happy about the flash situation, not really a big you tube fan but mine works just fine..I added Tweak flash plug in and hide user agent and the plug-in for firefox and they both play fine..the only thing i noted is that i can't change the frame rate in firefox as it seems to stay at 240 (think that's the lowest one) but it plays fine depending on my connection, now google is a different sorry if I take out or disable the hide user agent it only lets me play at 240 with the plug-in enable it lets me play all the frame rates but the higher ones are choppy but I have a terrible wifi connection at my apartment building..
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#1795
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
Actually that's a Yes, Yes, Yes. Adobe did most of the work because they wanted to get back at Apple, Google financed development and provided Android expertise and in the end Motorola paid the royalties. Had a single one of those lack motivation, there would be no Flash (just as it failed to materialize anything other than Android), so...
Quite wrong. Adobe made it available for the vendors, it's their job to place it into either their update process (OTA or otherwise) or make it available via the app store; if at all. The vendor/manufacturer makes the final decision if it's available for their platform.

Nokia made that decision for you. They didn't make it available for whatever reason that will make people rest easy at night - didn't want to pay royalties, didn't want to test it, didn't like the performance, didn't want to pay for more optimization work by Adobe, didn't want to optimize it themselves... whatever.

Google lightened the amount of how much OS level optimization was necessary by the vendors since they're the "controllers" of the OS. Who's the controller of Maemo?

Exactly.

... fixed it for you.
Your fix is flawed. Very flawed. Other platforms got it. Why didn't Nokia?

I mean... it's a pocketable computer, right? It should be able to handle lil' ol' Flash.

The point was that it is (and will be) a battle for each version of the player, for each OS version, for each device. Flash was dandy on the Maemo in the FP9 days. Flash 10.1 is dandy on (most) current Android devices. Flash 11 will be dandy on who knows what. It's a total lottery, depends on who will have the biggest $$$ case at the moment. Ceterum censeo, the current Flash Player distribution process delendam esse.
Name one process centering around browsing the web that doesn't require finances.

Browsers? Cost money to develop and append newer technology. Plugins? The little word called progress means that research and development as well as OS optimization will always be a part of the ordeal.

There's no lottery - that's perhaps made up. The fact that the prior generation - of which the N900 is on the cusp of - got obsolete quicker than anticipated and Adobe (and many others) started to go from 400-600mhz on the ARM platform to 800-1000mhz instead was due to either: lack of ability to optimize their bloated code on slower processes, their lack of willingness to backport to a minority or machines whereas many others were coming out that were faster, or ultimately they didn't just know how.

I mean... I dunno. Should I be more pissed off that my machine I bought a year ago is no longer supported by either the manufacturer or the vendors that have taken a cue from the manufacturer and raised their requirements to possibly what that manufacturer will have out soon enough?

That last bit of communication happens mostly business to business. Adobe knew what WebOS 2 was going to bring from the OS to the hardware. Adobe knew what Android was going to bring from the OS to the hardware. Adobe didn't know that Nokia was going to do... so they finished their work, handed it off to Nokia... and nothing happened.

A lot of people are upset about not getting FP10. A lot of people are upset at the wrong people. If TI got it and is releasing it in a totally unoptimized format, then why didn't Nokia do the same? Or better yet... where is the Nokia version that Adobe handed out to them?

Those questions are the right ones. Not some hackneyed and ill-aimed inquiry that goes back to Adobe. They did the work. Just like Microsoft did the work for Mozilla pertaining H.264 and playback whereas Mozilla didn't want to pay that license.

Nokia didn't release jack. Fix that.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
elie-7's Avatar
Posts: 968 | Thanked: 663 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Australia (Melbourne/vic) / Lebanon (Zgharta/north)
#1796
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
...since they're the "controllers" of the OS. Who's the controller of Maemo?


thats a very smart question, i'll say its the awesome community over here .
__________________
rolling down the street, smoking ENDO, sipping on gin and juice
laid back, with my mind on my money and my money on my mind .
 

The Following User Says Thank You to elie-7 For This Useful Post:
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#1797
Originally Posted by elie-7 View Post
thats a very smart question, i'll say its the awesome community over here .
It hasn't been fully transferred to this community. Not yet.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
elie-7's Avatar
Posts: 968 | Thanked: 663 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Australia (Melbourne/vic) / Lebanon (Zgharta/north)
#1798
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
It hasn't been fully transferred to this community. Not yet.
how awesome woulded it be if they do, wouldn't we get flash 10 than ? i don't mind paying the ' royalities '
__________________
rolling down the street, smoking ENDO, sipping on gin and juice
laid back, with my mind on my money and my money on my mind .
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#1799
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
180 pages is fast?
Naw, see, it got to nowhere fast and set up camp there.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#1800
Originally Posted by elie-7 View Post
how awesome woulded it be if they do, wouldn't we get flash 10 than ? i don't mind paying the ' royalities '
Doubtful closed source items like Flash and Skype will ever see any improvement, or distribution with the community based efforts to maintain Maemo.

But you better believe items like Modest will be improved upon.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
adobe, adobe flash, blahblah, flash, flash 10, flash 10.1, fremantle, future, idiotic thread, maemo, maemo 5, nokia, nokia fails, update


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:37.