Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#1821
Originally Posted by devu View Post
And here is first random link from google

http://techie-buzz.com/mobile-news/n...lash-10-1.html
The image on the page to which you linked shows a version string beginning with "FL". That's Flash Lite.

See the table "Flash Lite versions and returned version values" in "Detecting the Flash Lite version on a device".
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#1822
Originally Posted by retsaw View Post
Because you weren't listening? There were lots of complaints about the way Apple handled their obligations under the LGPL licence of the KHTML code Apple based Webkit on from the KHTML devs, at least there was in the earlier days of the Webkit project, I think Apple did improve the way they handled the code after a while, but I haven't really kept up on it so I don't know if they have improved enough to the satisfaction of the KHTML devs or not.
I'm not talking about the legal/moral implications - I'm not a fan of many things Apple does and how they do/did it, but whatever they did with webkit did not ruin the web as a whole, which is the premise here - that a 'dark, evil Flash' will be created and it will endanger the 'excellent' compatibility, multiplatform and performance track record of the original Flash player.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 303 | Thanked: 146 times | Joined on Aug 2009
#1823
I really wonder, why isn't there more effort into making Gnash work properly?
The GNU people (and Linux people in general) have equivalent programs for almost everything except for Skype and Flash. It can't be THAT hard to make something that can run ActionScript properly, now can it? Especially if Adobe charges money for their Flash plugin..
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Radu For This Useful Post:
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#1824
Originally Posted by Radu View Post
I really wonder, why isn't there more effort into making Gnash work properly?
The GNU people (and Linux people in general) have equivalent programs for almost everything except for Skype and Flash. It can't be THAT hard to make something that can run ActionScript properly, now can it? Especially if Adobe charges money for their Flash plugin..
Agreed, we need much more momentum thrown into GNASH, then maybe one day we can finally tell Adobe to piss off.
 
anapospastos's Avatar
Posts: 552 | Thanked: 183 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Not decided
#1825
I dont wanna look fool but why plugin shows version 10? Is that relative to tweak flash plugin app?

__________________
My name was Maemo, then it became Meego and now I'm getting a third one. I am Sailfish.
 
pelago's Avatar
Posts: 2,121 | Thanked: 1,540 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Oxford, UK
#1826
Originally Posted by anapospastos View Post
I dont wanna look fool but why plugin shows version 10? Is that relative to tweak flash plugin app?
Yes, if you've installed Tweak Flash Version then that will change the displayed version number of the plugin (without actually changing the capabilities of the plugin).
 

The Following User Says Thank You to pelago For This Useful Post:
anapospastos's Avatar
Posts: 552 | Thanked: 183 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Not decided
#1827
Originally Posted by pelago View Post
Yes, if you've installed Tweak Flash Version then that will change the displayed version number of the plugin (without actually changing the capabilities of the plugin).
I ve been thrilled for a while..
__________________
My name was Maemo, then it became Meego and now I'm getting a third one. I am Sailfish.
 
Posts: 251 | Thanked: 70 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#1828
Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
Agreed, we need much more momentum thrown into GNASH, then maybe one day we can finally tell Adobe to piss off.
It is the race you cannot win while damn ***** webmasters are requiring *NEW* version of flash being installed.
 
Posts: 291 | Thanked: 134 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ North-west, UK
#1829
Adobe doesn't charge for Flash.
__________________
Go on, press the 'thanks' link, you know you want to
 
Posts: 1,141 | Thanked: 781 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Magical Unicorn Land
#1830
Originally Posted by arkanoid View Post
It is the race you cannot win while damn ***** webmasters are requiring *NEW* version of flash being installed.
Same problem with Moonlight. As soon as it catches up to the latest features, Microsoft releases a new version of Silverlight that keeps us all out in the cold again.
 
Reply

Tags
adobe, adobe flash, blahblah, flash, flash 10, flash 10.1, fremantle, future, idiotic thread, maemo, maemo 5, nokia, nokia fails, update


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:46.