Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#181
Originally Posted by fanoush View Post
My understanding of this is "still same old browser code" in Diablo.
We can hope that SSU will decouple MicroB from the big dot releases, so maybe we'll see a real update in a month or two. :\
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#182
Originally Posted by fanoush View Post
The possible answer is hidden in different reply
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp....mo.devel/15402

"From a technical perspective, the browser team did not have enough
time/resources to merge to trunk (nor was there a stable trunk of any
value until long after we were frozen) and get any work done for diablo.
We therefore had to choose not to merge to trunk and plan to do it for a future release. "

My understanding of this is "still same old browser code" in Diablo.
Thanks for that; disappointing.

From the linked email:
I think the key is that you're ascribing this to be an OS release.
It isn't. it's a dot release. We never claimed it was a new OS release,
the marketing information on this is quite clear, and I can't imagine
anyone from Nokia would have claimed otherwise.
Which does seem to explain some things; Nokia considers point releases differently than, say, Microsoft, where we have NT 5.0, 5.1, and 5.2 all billed as completely new releases, and with the versioning very much swept under the rug.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post:
Posts: 373 | Thanked: 56 times | Joined on Dec 2005 @ Ottawa, ON
#183
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
We can hope that SSU will decouple MicroB from the big dot releases, so maybe we'll see a real update in a month or two. :\
That is my hope.

It seems that the browser team couldn't get synced to the new mozilla stuff in the trunk because of the early internal development freeze imposed by everything else. With everything independently update-able, they might be able to reduce the freeze->release time somewhat.

In the worst case, at least making beta builds/releases might be easier for them now. Those previous beta releases indicate a slowly shifting development culture within Nokia but it has some ways to go to match upstream.
 
Posts: 373 | Thanked: 56 times | Joined on Dec 2005 @ Ottawa, ON
#184
Originally Posted by Benson View Post
Nokia considers point releases differently than, say, Microsoft, where we have NT 5.0, 5.1, and 5.2 all billed as completely new releases, and with the versioning very much swept under the rug.
Version numbering is mostly a marketing thing, it would seem. Very different from project to project and very subjective. There are some stability-based versioning schemes out there but you still have to know the specific project cultural knowledge to know what they mean by version 2.9.

I kind of like the more objective, date-based versioning that Ubuntu and Gentoo use. Doesn't really tell you about the stability of it, but if every project used this at least you would roughly know what version of some dependency should go with what. Not perfect but better.
 
Posts: 93 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Sep 2007
#185
Originally Posted by luca View Post
From the ubuntu mobile faq (emphasis mine):



I remember reading that Nokia was going to port it to ARM..

http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2097004728.html
 
Posts: 9 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Mar 2008
#186
Originally Posted by spartanNTX View Post
I am still holding out hope that the "Navigation software gets an upgrade." mention here:
http://www.internettablettalk.com/20...wimax-edition/
and here
http://www.internettablettalk.com/fo...2&postcount=18
is significant. i.e. updated maps and improved acquisition times for the n810
Me too. I really want to buy the navigation but when I've tested it
the software was sadly outdated, it shows petrol stations thats
been closed for at least 5 years and routing repeatedly
suggested making illegal turns ...

I want a single unit, but since a nüvi 205 costs just
a little more than the 3 year wayfinder license I guess its
no deal unless the software is considerably improved.

Is anybody in a position that can confirm that the navigation software will be updated ?

Mikael
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#187
Has this been posted already?

http://mariusv.wordpress.com/2008/05...sant-surprise/

"I just upgraded a N800 from Chinook to a internal Diablo pre-release with apt-get."

Last edited by sd_proto; 2008-05-10 at 11:14.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
qwerty12's Avatar
Posts: 4,274 | Thanked: 5,358 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Looking at y'all and sighing
#188
**** ****.

I'm doing it now, thanks

(Thank God I use Linux as primary OS)

Ok, lifeguard reset is disabled. I'm now going to move the archives folder.

Wait, I need to read better:
*

I hope we can soon announce the repository that you need for this, but I can’t make any promises.

Last edited by qwerty12; 2008-05-10 at 09:40.
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#189
Originally Posted by Benson View Post
Thanks for that; disappointing.
Looks like they're on target for trunk with Diablo+1, anyway, though I couldn't get an answer out of timeless re SSU and decoupled updates. . . . Doesn't leave me particularly hopeful for avoiding Nokia's glacial release cycle.
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#190
Some of the more adept readers might have noticed that the Hildon App Mugger comes with 3 repositories preconfigured:
Well, I haven't the slightest clue where the correct repo is for Diablo, but if anyone comes up with any ideas involving 'sed s/chinook/diablo/' or equivalent, I suppose they could try them. (Hope mvo doesn't get in trouble over this...)
 

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08.