Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 6 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on May 2008 @ NY
#181
Great writeup, this probably would have helped me when I was originally deciding between the two.. I got the n800 because it was simply cheaper. It will be interesting to see if the touch makes up for its shortfalls after the developers start making apps..
 
MoridinBG's Avatar
Posts: 70 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Sep 2007
#182
Safari is a great browser, but I agree about the screen resolution. You really need to zoom in/out more than on the N800, but the zoom itself is way easier and smooth. When you browse a bigger web site you focus on part of it, then move next.
The screen is a killer. Under direct sunlight (at noon) there are only some glares here and there, but it is perfectly readable. Brightness at ~15-25% is more than enaugh for brioght and vivid screen.
__________________
Signature goes here.
 
Posts: 62 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#183
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
When it comes time for you to post your comparison.. and believe you me, you will.. please do so in the Competitors sub-forum, with a clear topic.. and don't forget to don your flame suit afterward!
I'm just gonna tack mine on here.

I had the 770 and have the N800 and will probably be getting a N810 as well - so I'm not an Apple fanboy. I just got my iPhone last week (from the US, hacked and using with a German prepaid card). I don't care about the limitations it has, when what it does have, just works great. I'm not posting to try to convince anybody of anything. Just my two cents to Nokia to get your ***** together. The NIT faction at Nokia is the biggest bunch of f'ups I've ever seen. (the suppositories, er, repositories screw-ups, developer discount program for N810, etc.)

I'm still down with Nokia, and still recommending the N800/N810 to friends and communities on the web...but I'm waffling.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:21.