Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 2,102 | Thanked: 1,309 times | Joined on Sep 2006
#181
and also the higher it goes for a given sensor area, the fewer photons you will detect and therefore the snr will be lower for a given scene.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lardman For This Useful Post:
Posts: 66 | Thanked: 21 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#182
Decided to put in my 2 bits before this thread hit 200. To be totally honest, I am almost completely satisfied with my N800. What it lacks, there are great 'hacks' and there are some things, it doesn't need(like being able to take underwater pictures while streaming HD video listening to pandora and writing an email). If the next gen Nxxx has a faster proc and some better software then I think it will be viable. I remember when I bought an ipod touch and was impressed with how pretty it was, and the potential it had. When I saw that it was never going to reach that potential, I gave it to my sister and got a N800. At first I was bummed because it was bulkier and not as 'pretty' but once I figured out how to make it go do that voodoo, that it do, so well, I never looked back.

To get back on subject, if I could solder on an improved processor and ram, I would be way more than satisfied with my N800.

ok maybe not exactly on topic. Sorry if my rant bugged you.

Last edited by buhao; 2009-01-27 at 14:32. Reason: idum
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to buhao For This Useful Post:
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#183
Originally Posted by deadmalc View Post
(assuming the lens isn't complete rubbish)
I think we can safely assume it'll be no worse than the other high-end N-series lenses. There was a comment somewhere about Zeiss, I think. . . .
__________________
Ryan Abel
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#184
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
I think we can safely assume it'll be no worse than the other high-end N-series lenses. There was a comment somewhere about Zeiss, I think. . . .
I think they're planning something like Tally Isham's Zeiss Ikon lenses.

Gibson's comments - photoshops - text
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!

Last edited by qole; 2009-01-27 at 19:48.
 
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#185
Actually there IS some merit in going for more megapixels. It can actually increase the quality of your low res images as the colour filter array interpolation will have less error. So, even if your optics can't resolve more than 3mpix, the 3mpix image of your 5mpix camera (if CCD data postprocessing is done right) will be better than a 3mpix camera's. Of course, the best is if you have adequate optics, but with mobile phone-class camera a lot of corners have to be cut...
 
lcuk's Avatar
Posts: 1,635 | Thanked: 1,816 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Manchester, England
#186
RGBRGB 2 pixels on a 2megapixel camera
RRGGBB 1 pixel on a 1megapixel camera

Interpolating from the 2 to the 1 will give a different average, BUT, usually the smaller pels are noisier so require more post processing.

Remember though, we are talking 100ths of a mm in either scenario.

Given the choice between 2 sensors chosen from the same factory and having to enforce both to the same lower mpixel range I would choose the lower mpixel one.

the signal to noise ratio of each pel is greater (larger surface, more light, more difference from background noise).
__________________
liqbase sketching the future.
like what i say? hit the Thanks, thanks!
twitter.com/lcuk
 
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#187
the signal to noise ratio of each pel is greater (larger surface, more light, more difference from background noise).
BUT we are not talking about the noise on each pel, rather image quality scaled to a common resolution Let's say you have a 1024x1024 sensor and a 2048x2048 one (same chip size & similar tech). Now, imagine you're doing some sort of binning (before demosaicing) on the second chip, 2x2 pels for 1. The SNR (of the end result) will statistically be the same, the sensitivity will be the nearly same BUT the details will be better as you don't have to count in the bayer CFA interpolation error (and maybe an AA filter) on your CCD done to avoid moire and other color artifacts. With the binning, you almost have a true RGB pel and will thus lose less details in postprocessing. If you run down the numbers, yes, the image will be a little less noisy on the low res sensor, but with significant loss in details (which in turn make human perception less bothered by noise). Of course, if your camera/phone manufacturer does not use this information or requires it to be implemented in software, there is little benefit in the extra pixels, but that's not the question of SNR or pel count, but rather the manufacturer's decisions. And now we're oficially as off-topic as it gets
 

The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,152 | Thanked: 1,490 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Czech Republic
#188
Here is small update based on fremantle alpha2 kernel, full source diff between alpha1 and 2 is here http://fanoush.wz.cz/maemo/kernel-2....090202r03.diff

- TV-out supported via Nokia AV accessory
- ECI headset (whatever it is) support added to AV jack
- kernel now has cpu frequency scaling enabled operating speeds are:
CPU 125,250,500,550,600 MHz
DSP 90,180,360,400,430 MHz
- ambient light sensor driver enabled (like N810 has)
- internal slot is indeed eMMC
__________________
Newbies click here before posting. Thanks.

If you really need to PM me with troubleshooting question please consider posting it to the forum instead. It is OK to PM me a link to such post then. Thank you.
 

The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to fanoush For This Useful Post:
Posts: 29 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jan 2009
#189
Originally Posted by fanoush View Post
Here is small update based on fremantle alpha2 kernel, full source diff between alpha1 and 2 is here http://fanoush.wz.cz/maemo/kernel-2....090202r03.diff

- TV-out supported via Nokia AV accessory
- ECI headset (whatever it is) support added to AV jack
- kernel now has cpu frequency scaling enabled operating speeds are:
CPU 125,250,500,550,600 MHz
DSP 90,180,360,400,430 MHz
- ambient light sensor driver enabled (like N810 has)
- internal slot is indeed eMMC
Thanks for keeping us posted!
 
lcuk's Avatar
Posts: 1,635 | Thanked: 1,816 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Manchester, England
#190
heh fanoush,
the glimpses we keep getting sound cool .

apart from the ambient sensor (my 810 has a sticker covering it cos my hand keeps getting in the way and changing brightness )
__________________
liqbase sketching the future.
like what i say? hit the Thanks, thanks!
twitter.com/lcuk
 
Reply

Tags
fremantle, iphone killer, n900, rover, rx-51


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:27.