The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-04-01
, 12:28
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#182
|
It's sad that you're not taking this opportunity to learn something. What exactly do you think you know that this community as a collective (IRC #maemo and maemo.org inclusive) doesn't already know about Nokia tablets? Don't bother, I'll answer that one: nothing. So what exactly has been your point? Again, read your title. This has been nothing but a car wreck from your first words. The exception is that the cops let the rubber-neckers get out and take a look. And some of us are still just sittin' here waitin' for the ambulance to show up.
![]() |
2009-04-01
, 13:23
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#183
|
I have never respected the "original purpose" of troll threads. They've always been a place to goof around, trash talk, and make small talk.
fun fact: i share my birthday with johnny appleseed!
(but he's not invited to my bday party [see tags])
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-04-01
, 14:07
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#184
|
Right on!
If a thread posts a simple question that received a simple answer or the consensus of the board is that the threads "original purpose" was counter productive, I concur.
This makes for some good entertainment. Especially when the OP and a first responder continue the argument...
>>Example<<
and
>>Example<<
I must admit I made an extra large bowl of popcorn and have enjoyed reading this thread...
I also found it educational and have now added useful terms like "Circle Jerk" to my vocabulary.
Keeping threads like this open also allows us to learn more about one another. For instance...
and
I'm sure we are all better people for knowing these things.
***
One thing that I don't get in this whole discussion about talking boxes ("what the box said") and things that "just work" is : compared to what?
I mean, did the OP have a dream of some future device? Are his expectations the same that he has for his desktop computer or laptop? Is he comparing it to another device that may do some things better but can't do all the things a tablet can?
I think it is all relative to the task at hand.
If you use a gun to kill something you first have to first find the right size ammunition and load it correctly. A knife on the other hand... just works.
![]() |
2009-04-01
, 14:40
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#185
|
![]() |
2009-04-01
, 14:53
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#186
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-04-01
, 15:22
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Salem, VA
|
#187
|
![]() |
2009-04-01
, 15:35
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#188
|
LOL, I'm on metaphor overload.
The most I've heard is "no ur dumb" or "no, you!"
Nobody has proven me wrong *factually*. Reason being is that there's a landslide of third party opinion waiting for us all to prove me right. It's just the entrenched users here who fail to understand I called the device out on it's weaknesses.
...just like countless others have. Even in this thread too!
...I'm forced to try and find whatever convoluted path other seemingly satisfied owners have followed to actually enjoy this ripoff.
enable "the secret actually be responsive" mode
slow mobile text mode demo web server
![]() |
2009-04-01
, 15:49
|
|
Posts: 610 |
Thanked: 391 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ DC, USA
|
#189
|
"It's" is a contraction, short for "it is." So this reads, "I called the device out on it is weaknesses."
"Its" is a possessive pronoun, as in "that which belongs to it" where "it" in this case is the device.
"It's" is often incorrectly used where "its" should be used since its ("it's") contraction of "it is" is not possessive.
![]() |
2009-04-01
, 16:50
|
Posts: 246 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#190
|
@kingka
the difference is, you actually seem like you would accept help.
![]() |
Tags |
n810 is a ripoff, n900 is useless, nokia ripoff, not as advertised, paid too much, unresponsive |
|
For example, just-works can be applied to any ecosystem (Windows, Linux, OSX). Take the default unit, use whatever defaults are given to you. Given those rules, most systems will just work unless the system is designed to be on the bleeding edge (Fedora or Debian). Similarly, Maemo just works in this case. If you stick to the defaults (like extras) then you shouldn't have many problems at all. It's when you start adding repos that you introduce problems.
The iPhone is commonly seen as something that 'just-works' and indeed it's true if your sticking to Apple's rules. But even then not all software you install just works. And if you want to go against what Apple has said (perhaps to install an application that Apple has rejected) then your introducing problems that may or may not cause problems.
So just-works is something each user defines. For myself, my computers go through periods of where things just-works, then periods of things just-not working (my girlfriend gets annoyed at these times), and back to periods of just-working again.