![]() |
2009-09-11
, 21:48
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#182
|
![]() |
2009-09-11
, 22:16
|
|
Posts: 294 |
Thanked: 174 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#183
|
![]() |
2009-09-11
, 22:23
|
Posts: 2 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Birmingham
|
#184
|
The only thing wrong with that quote is that you took it out of context. Here's the full paragraph:
"The N900 looks promising; unfortunately, Nokia is selling it at a fatal price of $649. That's the price of three iPhone 3GSes, plus tax. If T-Mobile picks it up, they might subsidize it, but even a $250 subsidy brings it down to $400 - more in netbook range than in smartphone range."
Which is accurate AFAIK.
![]() |
2009-09-11
, 22:32
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#185
|
Here's a post at Nokia Conversations that clears things up:
http://conversations.nokia.com/2009/...for-operators/
Last month, Nokia unveiled the Nokia N900, based on the 4th generation of Maemo software.
![]() |
2009-09-11
, 22:33
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#186
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-09-11
, 22:40
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#187
|
![]() |
2009-09-11
, 22:48
|
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ London
|
#188
|
But as long as we keep doing that, the ISP's will keep screwing us over.
And from Nokia's point of view - as long as they go the subsidized route, they will alse be screwer over and dictated to by the ISP's.
So the only way to stop this NONSENSE is to stop with the subsidized crap altogether.
That way the ISP's lose all leverage over anyone - the customer as well as the manufacturer.
![]() |
2009-09-11
, 22:56
|
Posts: 267 |
Thanked: 128 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Somerville MA - USA
|
#189
|
Theres nowt wrong with subsidised phones, it allows access to low income consumers. If they offer a phone for a range of upfront prices and charge a fair monthly amount, to make a fair profit, then its fine.
The problems start when carriers try to lock you down for multi year contracts, remove and block features, charge over inflated prices and offer little in return.
Carriers know change is coming, so they are screw*ng you for every penny while the goings good.
![]() |
2009-09-11
, 23:11
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#190
|
That doesn't make it make any more sense.4 != 5. I'm assuming they're not counting Maemo 1/2 separately.
Nokia TRIED to change the US model. Competitors saw an opportunity to grab market share as Nokia worked toward a more open, retail-based service. The effort worked against Nokia and in favor of LG, Samsung, Moto, et al.
Cracking the crazy US market would take more than Nokia-- it would take the combined effort of every single manufacturer getting on the same page and standing tough (or the FCC and FTC doing their jobs). I don't see that happening.
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net